Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.13147v2

In their paper titled "Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning? ", authors Junnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Linchen Xiao, Ziyi Wang, Kuikun Liu, Songyang Gao, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang and Kai Chen address the significant gap between benchmark performances and real-world applications in Large Language Models (LLMs). They argue that this disconnect is primarily due to current evaluation protocols and metrics failing to fully capture the diverse capabilities of LLMs. This is especially evident in complex reasoning tasks where accuracy and consistency are paramount. To bridge this divide, the authors introduce two key contributions. Firstly, they propose G-Pass@k - a novel evaluation metric that offers a continuous assessment of model performance across multiple sampling attempts. This metric not only quantifies the peak performance potential of LLMs but also evaluates their stability over various scenarios. Secondly, they present LiveMathBench - a dynamic benchmark consisting of challenging mathematical problems designed to minimize data leakage risks during evaluation. Through extensive experiments utilizing G-Pass@k on cutting-edge LLMs with LiveMathBench, the authors provide comprehensive insights into both the maximum capabilities and operational consistency of these models. Their findings underscore substantial room for improvement in LLMs' "realistic" reasoning abilities and emphasize the necessity for more robust evaluation methods in assessing these advanced language models. The detailed results and benchmark information can be accessed at: https://github.com/open-compass/GPassK.

• - Authors address the gap between benchmark performances and real-world applications in Large Language Models (LLMs)
• - Current evaluation protocols and metrics fail to fully capture the diverse capabilities of LLMs, especially in complex reasoning tasks
• - Introduce G-Pass@k as a novel evaluation metric for continuous assessment of model performance and stability
• - Present LiveMathBench as a dynamic benchmark for challenging mathematical problems to minimize data leakage risks during evaluation
• - Extensive experiments using G-Pass@k on cutting-edge LLMs with LiveMathBench provide insights into maximum capabilities and operational consistency of these models
• - Findings highlight room for improvement in LLMs' "realistic" reasoning abilities and emphasize the need for more robust evaluation methods

Summary- Authors are trying to make sure that big language models work well in real-life situations, not just on tests. - They think the current ways of testing these models don't show all the things they can do, especially in hard thinking tasks. - They made a new way called G-Pass@k to keep checking how well the models work and stay stable over time. - They also made LiveMathBench to test math problems without giving away too much information about the answers beforehand. - By using G-Pass@k and LiveMathBench, they learned more about what these models can do but also saw where they need to get better. Definitions- Benchmark performances: Standard levels of performance used as a comparison point. - Real-world applications: Using something in practical or everyday situations outside of tests or experiments. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Big computer programs that understand and generate human language. - Evaluation protocols: Rules or methods for testing and judging something's quality or performance. - Metrics: Measurements used to evaluate or compare different things.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been making headlines in recent years for their impressive performance on various natural language processing tasks. These models, such as GPT-3 and BERT, have shown remarkable capabilities in generating human-like text and completing complex language-based tasks. However, there is a growing concern that these benchmark performances do not necessarily translate to real-world applications. In their paper titled "Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?", authors Junnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Linchen Xiao, Ziyi Wang, Kuikun Liu, Songyang Gao, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang and Kai Chen address this significant gap between benchmark performances and real-world applications in LLMs. The authors argue that the disconnect between benchmark performances and real-world applications is primarily due to current evaluation protocols and metrics failing to fully capture the diverse capabilities of LLMs. While traditional evaluation methods focus on accuracy as the sole measure of model performance, this approach does not take into account other important factors such as consistency and stability. This is especially evident in complex reasoning tasks where accuracy alone may not be enough to determine a model's effectiveness. To bridge this divide, the authors propose two key contributions - G-Pass@k metric and LiveMathBench benchmark. G-Pass@k is a novel evaluation metric that offers a continuous assessment of model performance across multiple sampling attempts. Unlike traditional metrics that provide a single score for each task or dataset, G-Pass@k evaluates models based on their peak performance potential over multiple attempts with varying input data. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of an LLM's capabilities by taking into account its consistency across different scenarios. In addition to introducing G-Pass@k metric, the authors also present LiveMathBench - a dynamic benchmark consisting of challenging mathematical problems designed specifically for evaluating LLMs' reasoning abilities. The selection of these problems was carefully curated to minimize data leakage risks during evaluation, ensuring a fair and accurate assessment of the models' capabilities. To validate their proposed evaluation methods, the authors conducted extensive experiments on cutting-edge LLMs using LiveMathBench. The results showed that while these models excel in traditional language tasks, they still have substantial room for improvement in more complex reasoning tasks. This highlights the need for more robust evaluation methods that can accurately assess LLMs' "realistic" reasoning abilities. The detailed results and benchmark information are available on GitHub at https://github.com/open-compass/GPassK. This provides researchers and developers with access to the code used in this study, allowing for further exploration and validation of G-Pass@k metric and LiveMathBench benchmark. In conclusion, "Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?" is an important paper that addresses a significant gap in current evaluation protocols for Large Language Models. By introducing G-Pass@k metric and LiveMathBench benchmark, the authors provide valuable insights into both the maximum capabilities and operational consistency of these advanced language models. Their findings emphasize the need for more comprehensive evaluation methods to accurately assess LLMs' diverse capabilities beyond traditional accuracy measures.