Reasoning Language Models: A Blueprint
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) are a groundbreaking advancement in AI problem-solving capabilities
- RLMs, also known as Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), integrate advanced reasoning mechanisms into large language models (LLMs)
- Challenges faced by RLMs include high costs, proprietary constraints, and complex architectures combining RL, search heuristics, and LLMs
- Researchers led by Maciej Besta and Julia Barth propose a modular framework to organize RLM components for enhanced accessibility and scalability
- The blueprint includes diverse reasoning structures like chains, trees, graphs, and nested forms; reasoning strategies such as Monte Carlo Tree Search and Beam Search; RL concepts like policy and value models; supervision schemes like Output-Based and Process-Based Supervision
- Detailed mathematical formulations and algorithmic specifications simplify the implementation of RLMs within the framework
- Existing schemes like LLaMA-Berry, QwQ, Journey Learning, and Graph of Thoughts can be accommodated within the framework as special cases
- Practical applications of the blueprint are demonstrated through x1—a modular implementation for rapid prototyping and experimentation with RLMs
- Recommendations include multi-phase training strategies for policy and value models within RLMs while emphasizing familiar training distributions
- RLMs can seamlessly integrate into a broader LLM ecosystem encompassing tools and databases
- Efforts aim to democratize advanced reasoning capabilities across AI research communities by lowering barriers to RLM development through innovative frameworks like x1
Authors: Maciej Besta, Julia Barth, Eric Schreiber, Ales Kubicek, Afonso Catarino, Robert Gerstenberger, Piotr Nyczyk, Patrick Iff, Yueling Li, Sam Houliston, Tomasz Sternal, Marcin Copik, Grzegorz Kwaśniewski, Jürgen Müller, Łukasz Flis, Hannes Eberhard, Hubert Niewiadomski, Torsten Hoefler
Abstract: Reasoning language models (RLMs), also known as Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), such as OpenAI's o1 and o3, DeepSeek-V3, and Alibaba's QwQ, have redefined AI's problem-solving capabilities by extending large language models (LLMs) with advanced reasoning mechanisms. Yet, their high costs, proprietary nature, and complex architectures - uniquely combining Reinforcement Learning (RL), search heuristics, and LLMs - present accessibility and scalability challenges. To address these, we propose a comprehensive blueprint that organizes RLM components into a modular framework, based on a survey and analysis of all RLM works. This blueprint incorporates diverse reasoning structures (chains, trees, graphs, and nested forms), reasoning strategies (e.g., Monte Carlo Tree Search, Beam Search), RL concepts (policy, value models and others), and supervision schemes (Output-Based and Process-Based Supervision). We also provide detailed mathematical formulations and algorithmic specifications to simplify RLM implementation. By showing how schemes like LLaMA-Berry, QwQ, Journey Learning, and Graph of Thoughts fit as special cases, we demonstrate the blueprint's versatility and unifying potential. To illustrate its utility, we introduce x1, a modular implementation for rapid RLM prototyping and experimentation. Using x1 and a literature review, we provide key insights, such as multi-phase training for policy and value models, and the importance of familiar training distributions. Finally, we outline how RLMs can integrate with a broader LLM ecosystem, including tools and databases. Our work demystifies RLM construction, democratizes advanced reasoning capabilities, and fosters innovation, aiming to mitigate the gap between "rich AI" and "poor AI" by lowering barriers to RLM development and experimentation.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.