PlanGEN: A Multi-Agent Framework for Generating Planning and Reasoning Trajectories for Complex Problem Solving

AI-generated keywords: Agent frameworks

AI-generated Key Points

  • Challenges faced by agent frameworks and inference-time algorithms in dealing with complex planning problems:
  • Limitations in verifying generated plans
  • Reasoning difficulties
  • Varying complexity of instances within a single task
  • Introduction of PlanGEN, a new model-agnostic and easily scalable agent framework consisting of three key components:
  • Constraint agents
  • Verification agents
  • Selection agents
  • Features of PlanGEN:
  • Introduces constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance existing inference-time algorithms like Best of N, Tree-of-Thought, and REBASE
  • Optimizes algorithm choice based on instance complexity for better adaptability to complex planning problems
  • Experimental results showcasing the effectiveness of PlanGEN across multiple benchmarks:
  • State-of-the-art results achieved on NATURAL PLAN, OlympiadBench, DocFinQA, and GPQA with notable percentage improvements
  • Evaluation methodology using various datasets including NATURAL PLAN, GPQA, OlympiadBench, and DocFinQA:
  • Two-stage approach involving plan generation with PlanGEN frameworks and plan execution for final answers
  • Conclusion highlighting the scalability and generalizability of PlanGEN as a multi-agent approach that enhances the verification process of existing inference algorithms.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Mihir Parmar, Xin Liu, Palash Goyal, Yanfei Chen, Long Le, Swaroop Mishra, Hossein Mobahi, Jindong Gu, Zifeng Wang, Hootan Nakhost, Chitta Baral, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister, Hamid Palangi

30 pages
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Recent agent frameworks and inference-time algorithms often struggle with complex planning problems due to limitations in verifying generated plans or reasoning and varying complexity of instances within a single task. Many existing methods for these tasks either perform task-level verification without considering constraints or apply inference-time algorithms without adapting to instance-level complexity. To address these limitations, we propose PlanGEN, a model-agnostic and easily scalable agent framework with three key components: constraint, verification, and selection agents. Specifically, our approach proposes constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance performance of inference-time algorithms--Best of N, Tree-of-Thought, and REBASE. In PlanGEN framework, the selection agent optimizes algorithm choice based on instance complexity, ensuring better adaptability to complex planning problems. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements over the strongest baseline across multiple benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art results on NATURAL PLAN ($\sim$8%$\uparrow$), OlympiadBench ($\sim$4%$\uparrow$), DocFinQA ($\sim$7%$\uparrow$), and GPQA ($\sim$1%$\uparrow$). Our key finding highlights that constraint-guided iterative verification improves inference-time algorithms, and adaptive selection further boosts performance on complex planning and reasoning problems.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Feb. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2502.16111v1

, , , , In recent years, agent frameworks and inference-time algorithms have faced challenges when dealing with complex planning problems. These challenges arise from limitations in verifying generated plans, reasoning, and the varying complexity of instances within a single task. Existing methods either focus on task-level verification without considering constraints or apply inference-time algorithms without adapting to instance-level complexity. To address these limitations, a new model-agnostic and easily scalable agent framework called PlanGEN has been proposed. is a multi-agent approach consisting of three key components: constraint agents, verification agents, and selection agents. The framework introduces constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance the performance of existing inference-time algorithms such as Best of N, Tree-of-Thought, and REBASE. Additionally, the selection agent optimizes algorithm choice based on instance complexity to ensure better adaptability to complex planning problems. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements over the strongest baseline across multiple benchmarks. PlanGEN achieves state-of-the-art results on NATURAL PLAN (approximately 8% improvement), OlympiadBench (approximately 4% improvement), DocFinQA (approximately 7% improvement), and GPQA (approximately 1% improvement). This highlights that constraint-guided iterative verification enhances inference-time algorithms while adaptive selection further boosts performance on complex planning and reasoning problems. The experiments were conducted using various datasets including NATURAL PLAN for natural planning abilities enhancement, GPQA and OlympiadBench for reasoning capabilities improvement of LLMs, and DocFinQA for domain-specific dataset evaluation. Two baselines were developed for comparison: Zero-shot CoT and a Vanilla Multi-Agent Baseline. The proposed frameworks were evaluated on all benchmarks using a two-stage approach: generating an optimized plan with PlanGEN frameworks and executing the plan to produce final answers. Performance comparisons across four benchmarks show that the multi-agent frameworks consistently outperform both single-agent and multi-agent baselines. In conclusion, is an easily scalable multi-agent approach that improves the verification process of existing inference algorithms by incorporating constraint, verification, and selection agents. The experimental results demonstrate that outperforms strong baselines across datasets while also being scalable and generalizable to different LLMs for enhancing their natural language planning ability.
Created on 03 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.