Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2502.16111v1

, , , , In recent years, agent frameworks and inference-time algorithms have faced challenges when dealing with complex planning problems. These challenges arise from limitations in verifying generated plans, reasoning, and the varying complexity of instances within a single task. Existing methods either focus on task-level verification without considering constraints or apply inference-time algorithms without adapting to instance-level complexity. To address these limitations, a new model-agnostic and easily scalable agent framework called PlanGEN has been proposed. is a multi-agent approach consisting of three key components: constraint agents, verification agents, and selection agents. The framework introduces constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance the performance of existing inference-time algorithms such as Best of N, Tree-of-Thought, and REBASE. Additionally, the selection agent optimizes algorithm choice based on instance complexity to ensure better adaptability to complex planning problems. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements over the strongest baseline across multiple benchmarks. PlanGEN achieves state-of-the-art results on NATURAL PLAN (approximately 8% improvement), OlympiadBench (approximately 4% improvement), DocFinQA (approximately 7% improvement), and GPQA (approximately 1% improvement). This highlights that constraint-guided iterative verification enhances inference-time algorithms while adaptive selection further boosts performance on complex planning and reasoning problems. The experiments were conducted using various datasets including NATURAL PLAN for natural planning abilities enhancement, GPQA and OlympiadBench for reasoning capabilities improvement of LLMs, and DocFinQA for domain-specific dataset evaluation. Two baselines were developed for comparison: Zero-shot CoT and a Vanilla Multi-Agent Baseline. The proposed frameworks were evaluated on all benchmarks using a two-stage approach: generating an optimized plan with PlanGEN frameworks and executing the plan to produce final answers. Performance comparisons across four benchmarks show that the multi-agent frameworks consistently outperform both single-agent and multi-agent baselines. In conclusion, is an easily scalable multi-agent approach that improves the verification process of existing inference algorithms by incorporating constraint, verification, and selection agents. The experimental results demonstrate that outperforms strong baselines across datasets while also being scalable and generalizable to different LLMs for enhancing their natural language planning ability.

• - Challenges faced by agent frameworks and inference-time algorithms in dealing with complex planning problems:
• - Limitations in verifying generated plans
• - Reasoning difficulties
• - Varying complexity of instances within a single task
• - Introduction of PlanGEN, a new model-agnostic and easily scalable agent framework consisting of three key components:
• - Constraint agents
• - Verification agents
• - Selection agents
• - Features of PlanGEN:
• - Introduces constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance existing inference-time algorithms like Best of N, Tree-of-Thought, and REBASE
• - Optimizes algorithm choice based on instance complexity for better adaptability to complex planning problems
• - Experimental results showcasing the effectiveness of PlanGEN across multiple benchmarks:
• - State-of-the-art results achieved on NATURAL PLAN, OlympiadBench, DocFinQA, and GPQA with notable percentage improvements
• - Evaluation methodology using various datasets including NATURAL PLAN, GPQA, OlympiadBench, and DocFinQA:
• - Two-stage approach involving plan generation with PlanGEN frameworks and plan execution for final answers
• - Conclusion highlighting the scalability and generalizability of PlanGEN as a multi-agent approach that enhances the verification process of existing inference algorithms.

SummaryAgent frameworks and inference-time algorithms face challenges in dealing with complex planning problems due to limitations in verifying plans, reasoning difficulties, and varying complexity within tasks. PlanGEN is a new agent framework with three key components: Constraint agents, Verification agents, and Selection agents. It introduces constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance existing algorithms and optimizes algorithm choice based on instance complexity. Experimental results show PlanGEN's effectiveness across multiple benchmarks with state-of-the-art results achieved. The evaluation methodology involves plan generation using PlanGEN frameworks and plan execution for final answers. Definitions- Agent frameworks: Systems that use software agents to perform tasks or make decisions. - Inference-time algorithms: Algorithms used during the process of making predictions or decisions. - Verification: The process of confirming the accuracy or correctness of something. - Constraints: Limitations or restrictions that must be followed. - Iterative: A process that repeats multiple times to achieve a desired outcome. - Benchmark: A standard by which something can be measured or evaluated. - Generalizability: The ability of something to be applied across different situations or contexts.

Title: Enhancing Inference-Time Algorithms with PlanGEN: A Multi-Agent Approach for Complex Planning Problems Introduction: In recent years, there has been a growing interest in developing efficient and scalable agent frameworks to tackle complex planning problems. However, existing methods have faced challenges in verifying generated plans, reasoning, and adapting to varying levels of complexity within a single task. To address these limitations, researchers have proposed a new model-agnostic and easily scalable multi-agent framework called PlanGEN. Overview of PlanGEN: PlanGEN consists of three key components - constraint agents, verification agents, and selection agents. The framework introduces constraint-guided iterative verification to enhance the performance of existing inference-time algorithms such as Best of N, Tree-of-Thought, and REBASE. Additionally, the selection agent optimizes algorithm choice based on instance complexity to ensure better adaptability to complex planning problems. Experimental Results: To evaluate the effectiveness of PlanGEN, experiments were conducted using various datasets including NATURAL PLAN for natural planning abilities enhancement, GPQA and OlympiadBench for reasoning capabilities improvement of LLMs (Language Model Models), and DocFinQA for domain-specific dataset evaluation. Two baselines were developed for comparison - Zero-shot CoT (Constrained Optimization Technique) and a Vanilla Multi-Agent Baseline. Performance comparisons across four benchmarks show that the multi-agent frameworks consistently outperform both single-agent and multi-agent baselines. Specifically, PlanGEN achieves state-of-the-art results on NATURAL PLAN (approximately 8% improvement), OlympiadBench (approximately 4% improvement), DocFinQA (approximately 7% improvement), and GPQA (approximately 1% improvement). This highlights that constraint-guided iterative verification enhances inference-time algorithms while adaptive selection further boosts performance on complex planning and reasoning problems. Conclusion: In conclusion, is an easily scalable multi-agent approach that improves the verification process of existing inference algorithms by incorporating constraint, verification, and selection agents. The experimental results demonstrate that PlanGEN outperforms strong baselines across datasets while also being scalable and generalizable to different LLMs for enhancing their natural language planning ability. Future Directions: While the results of this research are promising, there is still room for improvement in the PlanGEN framework. Future directions could include exploring different combinations of constraint-guided iterative verification and adaptive selection techniques, as well as incorporating other types of agents such as learning or communication agents. Additionally, further experiments on larger and more diverse datasets could provide a better understanding of the scalability and generalizability of PlanGEN. Conclusion: In summary, PlanGEN is a novel multi-agent approach that addresses limitations in existing agent frameworks when dealing with complex planning problems. By incorporating constraint-guided iterative verification and adaptive selection techniques, it outperforms strong baselines across multiple benchmarks. This research opens up new possibilities for improving inference-time algorithms and enhancing natural language planning abilities in various domains.