Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective and Explainable Multi-Agent Credit Assignment
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors Kartik Nagpal, Dayi Dong, Jean-Baptiste Bouvier, and Negar Mehr address evaluating individual agents' contributions in a team towards shared goals
- Importance of learning collaborative behavior in domains like autonomous vehicle coordination and in-space assembly emphasized
- Proposal of novel approach LLM-MCA (Large Language Model-Multi-Agent Credit Assignment) utilizing Large Language Models to solve credit assignment problem
- Reformulation of credit assignment as sequence improvement and attribution pattern recognition problems using centralized LLM reward-critic
- Feedback from LLM used to update policy networks of agents for personalized evaluations and performance improvement
- Introduction of extension LLM-TACA where LLM critic assigns tasks by providing intermediary goals directly to each agent's policy
- Outperformance of existing methods on benchmarks including Level-Based Foraging, Robotic Warehouse tasks, and Spaceworld benchmark with collision-related safety constraints
- Generation of large trajectory datasets with per-agent reward information sampled from LLM critics due to proposed methods
- Advancement in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning demonstrated through integration of human-level performance from Large Language Models for enhancing collaborative behavior learning in robotic systems
Authors: Kartik Nagpal, Dayi Dong, Jean-Baptiste Bouvier, Negar Mehr
Abstract: Recent work, spanning from autonomous vehicle coordination to in-space assembly, has shown the importance of learning collaborative behavior for enabling robots to achieve shared goals. A common approach for learning this cooperative behavior is to utilize the centralized-training decentralized-execution paradigm. However, this approach also introduces a new challenge: how do we evaluate the contributions of each agent's actions to the overall success or failure of the team. This credit assignment problem has remained open, and has been extensively studied in the Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning literature. In fact, humans manually inspecting agent behavior often generate better credit evaluations than existing methods. We combine this observation with recent works which show Large Language Models demonstrate human-level performance at many pattern recognition tasks. Our key idea is to reformulate credit assignment to the two pattern recognition problems of sequence improvement and attribution, which motivates our novel LLM-MCA method. Our approach utilizes a centralized LLM reward-critic which numerically decomposes the environment reward based on the individualized contribution of each agent in the scenario. We then update the agents' policy networks based on this feedback. We also propose an extension LLM-TACA where our LLM critic performs explicit task assignment by passing an intermediary goal directly to each agent policy in the scenario. Both our methods far outperform the state-of-the-art on a variety of benchmarks, including Level-Based Foraging, Robotic Warehouse, and our new Spaceworld benchmark which incorporates collision-related safety constraints. As an artifact of our methods, we generate large trajectory datasets with each timestep annotated with per-agent reward information, as sampled from our LLM critics.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.