DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest

AI-generated keywords: Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Lyman-alpha Forest Data Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Quasar Spectra Cosmological Parameters

AI-generated Key Points

  • Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements using Lyman-alpha (LyA) forest data from the second data release (DR2) of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey
  • Analysis includes auto-correlation and cross-correlation of LyA forest absorption with quasar positions
  • Sample size is over 820,000 quasar spectra and positions of over 1.2 million quasars
  • Achieved statistical precision of 1.1% along and 1.3% transverse to the line of sight for the BAO scale at $z_{eff} = 2.33$, resulting in a combined precision of 0.65% on the isotropic BAO scale
  • Significant improvements to analysis include changes in distortion matrix calculations, model metal-line contamination, and introduction of a systematic error term due to nonlinear growth affecting BAO shifts
  • Measurements yield ratios $D_H(z_{eff})/r_d = 8.632 \pm 0.098 \pm 0.026$ and $D_M(z_{eff})/r_d = 38.99 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.12$
  • Structure of paper includes sections on DESI survey details, spectroscopic analysis methods, redshift measurements, QSO catalog generation, ancillary catalogs for absorption systems identification, and Lyα forest fluctuation extraction techniques
  • Future analyses will focus on more precise cosmological parameter measurements through full-shape modeling of galaxy and quasar clustering similar to DR1 studies, as well as full-shape modeling of Lyα forest data with eBOSS datasets
  • Supporting papers provide insights into Damped Lyman-α absorbers identification methods in data sets and validation tests using synthetic datasets constructed for analysis verification
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, A. Aviles, S. Bailey, A. Bault, S. BenZvi, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. Canning, A. Carnero Rosell, P. Carrilho, L. Casas, F. J. Castander, R. Cereskaite, M. Charles, E. Chaussidon, J. Chaves-Montero, D. Chebat, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole, A. P. Cooper, A. Cuceu, K. S. Dawson, R. de Belsunce, A. de la Macorra, A. de Mattia, N. Deiosso, J. Della Costa, A. Dey, B. Dey, Z. Ding, P. Doel, J. Edelstein, D. J. Eisenstein, W. Elbers, P. Fagrelius, K. Fanning, S. Ferraro, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, C. Garcia-Quintero, L. H. Garrison, E. Gaztañaga, H. Gil-Marín, S. Gontcho A Gontcho, A. X. Gonzalez-Morales, C. Gordon, D. Green, G. Gutierrez, J. Guy, C. Hahn, M. Herbold, H. K. Herrera-Alcantar, M. Ho, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett, D. Huterer, M. Ishak, S. Juneau, N. G. Karaçaylı, R. Kehoe, S. Kent, D. Kirkby, T. Kisner, F. -S. Kitaura, S. E. Koposov, A. Kremin, O. Lahav, C. Lamman, M. Landriau, D. Lang, J. Lasker, J. M. Le Goff, L. Le Guillou, A. Leauthaud, M. E. Levi, Q. Li, T. S. Li, K. Lodha, M. Lokken, C. Magneville, M. Manera, P. Martini, W. Matthewson, P. McDonald, A. Meisner, J. Mena-Fernández, R. Miquel, J. Moustakas, A. Muñoz-Gutiérrez, D. Muñoz-Santos, A. D. Myers, J. A. Newman, G. Niz, H. E. Noriega, E. Paillas, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, J. Pan, W. J. Percival, I. Pérez-Ràfols, M. M. Pieri, C. Poppett, F. Prada, D. Rabinowitz, A. Raichoor, C. Ramírez-Pérez, M. Rashkovetskyi, C. Ravoux, J. Rich, C. Rockosi, A. J. Ross, G. Rossi, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, E. Sanchez, N. Sanders, S. Satyavolu, D. Schlegel, M. Schubnell, H. Seo, A. Shafieloo, R. Sharples, J. Silber, F. Sinigaglia, D. Sprayberry, T. Tan, G. Tarlé, P. Taylor, W. Turner, F. Valdes, M. Vargas-Magaña, M. Walther, B. A. Weaver, M. Wolfson, C. Yèche, P. Zarrouk, R. Zhou, H. Zou

arXiv: 2503.14739v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
This DESI Collaboration Publication is part of the Data Release 2 publication series (see https://data.desi.lbl.gov/doc/papers )
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements with the Lyman-alpha (LyA) forest from the second data release (DR2) of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. Our BAO measurements include both the auto-correlation of the LyA forest absorption observed in the spectra of high-redshift quasars and the cross-correlation of the absorption with the quasar positions. The total sample size is approximately a factor of two larger than the DR1 dataset, with forest measurements in over 820,000 quasar spectra and the positions of over 1.2 million quasars. We describe several significant improvements to our analysis in this paper, and two supporting papers describe improvements to the synthetic datasets that we use for validation and how we identify damped LyA absorbers. Our main result is that we have measured the BAO scale with a statistical precision of 1.1% along and 1.3% transverse to the line of sight, for a combined precision of 0.65% on the isotropic BAO scale at $z_{eff} = 2.33$. This excellent precision, combined with recent theoretical studies of the BAO shift due to nonlinear growth, motivated us to include a systematic error term in LyA BAO analysis for the first time. We measure the ratios $D_H(z_{eff})/r_d = 8.632 \pm 0.098 \pm 0.026$ and $D_M(z_{eff})/r_d = 38.99 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.12$, where $D_H = c/H(z)$ is the Hubble distance, $D_M$ is the transverse comoving distance, $r_d$ is the sound horizon at the drag epoch, and we quote both the statistical and the theoretical systematic uncertainty. The companion paper presents the BAO measurements at lower redshifts from the same dataset and the cosmological interpretation.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.14739v1

In this paper, we present the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements using Lyman-alpha (LyA) forest data from the second data release (DR2) of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. Our analysis includes both the auto-correlation of LyA forest absorption in high-redshift quasar spectra and the cross-correlation of this absorption with quasar positions. With a sample size approximately twice as large as DR1, including over 820,000 quasar spectra and positions of over 1.2 million quasars, we have achieved a statistical precision of 1.1% along and 1.3% transverse to the line of sight for the BAO scale at $z_{eff} = 2.33$, resulting in a combined precision of 0.65% on the isotropic BAO scale. Significant improvements to our analysis are described in this paper, including changes to how we calculate distortion matrices and model metal-line contamination. We also introduce a systematic error term for the first time in LyA BAO analysis due to recent theoretical studies on nonlinear growth affecting BAO shifts. Our measurements yield ratios $D_H(z_{eff})/r_d = 8.632 \pm 0.098 \pm 0.026$ and $D_M(z_{eff})/r_d = 38.99 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.12$, where $D_H$ is the Hubble distance, $D_M$ is the transverse comoving distance, and $r_d$ is the sound horizon at drag epoch. The structure of this paper includes sections on DESI survey details, spectroscopic analysis methods, redshift measurements, QSO catalog generation, ancillary catalogs for absorption systems identification, and Lyα forest fluctuation extraction techniques. Future analyses using DESI DR2 data will focus on more precise cosmological parameter measurements through full-shape modeling of galaxy and quasar clustering similar to DR1 studies, as well as full-shape modeling of Lyα forest data with eBOSS datasets. Supporting papers provide further insights into Damped Lyman-α absorbers identification methods in data sets and validation tests using synthetic datasets constructed for analysis verification. Overall, our results contribute valuable information to ongoing research on dark energy properties and cosmological implications within the context of large-scale surveys like DESI.
Created on 21 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.