Multiwavelength Analysis of GRB 250101A: From Gamma-ray Prompt Emission to Optical Afterglow

AI-generated keywords: Gamma-ray Burst

AI-generated Key Points

  • Researchers conducted a comprehensive multiwavelength analysis of Gamma-ray Burst (GRB) 250101A
  • Spectral analysis of the prompt emission revealed a soft spectrum with a low-energy photon index of -1.18 and a peak energy of 33 keV
  • GRB 250101A identified as an X-ray-rich or X-ray-dominated burst, with unique properties setting it apart from classical GRBs
  • Optical observations showed a distinct power-law decay in multiple bands, deviating significantly from theoretical predictions
  • Structural change in the optical light curve indicated a significant density drop (~50%) in the interstellar medium at about 0.05 parsecs from the burst location
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Guowang Du, Yehao Cheng, Yuan-Pei Yang, Jun Yang, Jinghua Zhang, Dan Zhu, Yu Pan, Yuan Fang, Xingzhu Zou, Brajesh Kumar, Helong Guo, Xufeng Zhu, Yangwei Zhang, Fanchuan Kong, Chenxi Shang, Xinlei Chen, Xiangkun Liu, Xiaowei Liu

arXiv: 2503.15805v1 - DOI (astro-ph.HE)
20 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables. Comments welcome!
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most luminous transients in the universe. The interaction between the relativistic jet and the circumburst medium produces a multiwavelength afterglow through synchrotron radiation. In this work, we present multiwavelength properties of GRB~250101A based on the observations of Swift, Fermi, and Multi-channel Photometric Survey Telescope (Mephisto). The spectral analysis of Swift/BAT and Fermi/GBM reveals a soft prompt spectrum with a low-energy photon index of $-1.18$ and a peak energy of 33 keV, and the isotropic energy is $1.4\times10^{52}~{\rm erg}$. The prompt emission of GRB 250101A aligns with Type II GRBs in the Amati relation. Meanwhile, our analysis indicates that GRB 250101A is an X-ray-rich or X-ray-dominated GRB, with intrinsic properties suggesting that it is relatively softer than most classical GRBs. Optical observation with Mephisto, beginning 197 s post-trigger, shows a single power-law decay in $uvgriz$ bands, with $F_{\nu,\mathrm{obs}} \propto t^{-0.76} \nu^{-1.20}$. The observed spectral index significantly exceeds theoretical predictions under standard afterglow models, suggesting a color excess of $\sim0.21$ mag. However, combining X-ray and optical afterglow, we find that GRB 250101A is more likely a ``normal burst'' rather than an ``optical-dark burst'', and the dust extinction effect plays an important role in the optical blue bands. Furthermore, there is a structural change at $T_0+2924$ s in the optical light curve, indicating a density drop of $\sim50$ \% in the interstellar medium at a distance of $\sim0.05~{\rm pc}$.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.15805v1

, , , , In this study, the researchers conducted a comprehensive multiwavelength analysis of Gamma-ray Burst (GRB) 250101A, shedding light on various aspects of this intriguing cosmic event. GRBs are known to be the most luminous transients in the universe, and their afterglows provide valuable insights into the physics of relativistic jets and their interactions with the surrounding medium. The team utilized data from multiple observatories including Swift, Fermi, and the Multi-channel Photometric Survey Telescope (Mephisto) to investigate different aspects of GRB 250101A. Spectral analysis of the prompt emission revealed a soft spectrum with a low-energy photon index of -1.18 and a peak energy of 33 keV, indicating an isotropic energy output of $1.4\times10^{52}~{\rm erg}$. Interestingly, the prompt emission characteristics aligned with Type II GRBs in the Amati relation, suggesting unique properties for this particular burst. Furthermore, the researchers identified GRB 250101A as an X-ray-rich or X-ray-dominated burst, with intrinsic features that set it apart from classical GRBs. Optical observations using Mephisto showed a distinct power-law decay in multiple bands (uvgriz), with spectral indices deviating significantly from theoretical predictions under standard afterglow models. This discrepancy hinted at a color excess of approximately 0.21 magnitudes, highlighting potential complexities in understanding the optical behavior of this burst. By combining X-ray and optical afterglow data, the team concluded that GRB 250101A was more likely a "normal burst" rather than an "optical-dark burst", emphasizing the role of dust extinction effects in shaping its observed properties. Notably, a structural change in the optical light curve around $T_0+2924$ seconds indicated a significant density drop (~50%) in the interstellar medium at a distance of about 0.05 parsecs from the burst location. Overall, this detailed analysis provided valuable insights into the multiwavelength properties of GRB 250101A, showcasing its unique characteristics and shedding light on its complex interaction with its environment. The findings contribute to our understanding of these enigmatic cosmic events and pave the way for further exploration into their underlying mechanisms.
Created on 16 Jun. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.