Is Your LLM Overcharging You? Tokenization, Transparency, and Incentives

AI-generated keywords: Financial incentives

AI-generated Key Points

  • Financial incentives of cloud-based providers offering Large Language Models (LLMs) as a service are the focus
  • Prevalent pay-per-token pricing mechanism incentivizes providers to misreport tokenization of outputs
  • Transparency about generative process makes it difficult for unfaithful providers to benefit from misreporting
  • Introduction of an efficient algorithm allows transparent providers to overcharge users without detection
  • Proposal for a new pricing mechanism called pay-per-character to prevent exploitation and ensure fair pricing
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ander Artola Velasco, Stratis Tsirtsis, Nastaran Okati, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: State-of-the-art large language models require specialized hardware and substantial energy to operate. As a consequence, cloud-based services that provide access to large language models have become very popular. In these services, the price users pay for an output provided by a model depends on the number of tokens the model uses to generate it -- they pay a fixed price per token. In this work, we show that this pricing mechanism creates a financial incentive for providers to strategize and misreport the (number of) tokens a model used to generate an output, and users cannot prove, or even know, whether a provider is overcharging them. However, we also show that, if an unfaithful provider is obliged to be transparent about the generative process used by the model, misreporting optimally without raising suspicion is hard. Nevertheless, as a proof-of-concept, we develop an efficient heuristic algorithm that allows providers to significantly overcharge users without raising suspicion. Crucially, we demonstrate that the cost of running the algorithm is lower than the additional revenue from overcharging users, highlighting the vulnerability of users under the current pay-per-token pricing mechanism. Further, we show that, to eliminate the financial incentive to strategize, a pricing mechanism must price tokens linearly on their character count. While this makes a provider's profit margin vary across tokens, we introduce a simple prescription under which the provider who adopts such an incentive-compatible pricing mechanism can maintain the average profit margin they had under the pay-per-token pricing mechanism. Along the way, to illustrate and complement our theoretical results, we conduct experiments with several large language models from the $\texttt{Llama}$, $\texttt{Gemma}$ and $\texttt{Ministral}$ families, and input prompts from the LMSYS Chatbot Arena platform.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 May. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2505.21627v2

, , , , The financial incentives of cloud-based providers offering Large Language Models (LLMs) as a service are the focus of this study. The prevalent pay-per-token pricing mechanism used in these services incentivizes providers to misreport the tokenization of outputs generated by LLMs, potentially overcharging users without their knowledge. The research demonstrates that transparency about the generative process used by LLMs makes it difficult for unfaithful providers to strategically benefit from misreporting without raising suspicion. However, an efficient algorithm is introduced that allows transparent providers to significantly overcharge users while avoiding detection. To address this vulnerability and eliminate the financial incentive for misreporting tokenizations, a simple alternative pricing mechanism called pay-per-character is proposed. This new approach prices tokens linearly based on their character count, ensuring fair pricing and preventing providers from exploiting users through strategic misreporting. The study emphasizes the importance of shifting towards incentive-compatible pricing mechanisms like pay-per-character to protect users from potential exploitation by unscrupulous providers. Additionally, experiments conducted with various large language models from different families and input prompts from the LMSYS Chatbot Arena platform support and complement the theoretical findings presented in the study. Overall, this work sheds light on the risks associated with pay-per-token pricing mechanisms in LLM-as-a-service offerings and advocates for a paradigm shift towards more transparent and fair pricing strategies to safeguard user interests.
Created on 17 Oct. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.