Vertex and front-tracking methods for the modeling of microstructure evolution at the solid state: a brief review

AI-generated keywords: Mesoscopic scale

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study of mesoscopic scale microstructure evolution modeling involves Front-Capturing (FC) and Front-Tracking (FT) methods
  • Efficient approaches for studying physical mechanisms related to interface properties and geometries
  • Potential applications in intragranular phenomena
  • Recent advances highlight computational efficiency and analysis of mobility and energy properties
  • Challenges remain in managing complex topological events, especially in 3D simulations
  • Lazar et al. introduced a method based on a discretized version of the MacPherson-Srolovitz relationship for simulating ideal grain growth with uniform grain boundary characteristics
  • Eren et al. proposed a new 3D approach based on a finite element mesh for optimizing numerical cost, modeling grain growth, and allowing efficient resolution and remeshing operations using parallelized finite-element libraries
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Marc Bernacki

arXiv: 2510.21818v1 - DOI (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: In mesoscopic scale microstructure evolution modeling, two primary numerical frameworks are used: Front-Capturing (FC) and Front-Tracking (FT) ones. FC models, like phase-field or level-set methods, indirectly define interfaces by tracking field variable changes. On the contrary, FT models explicitly define interfaces using interconnected segments or surfaces. In historical FT methodologies, Vertex models were first developed and consider the description of the evolution of polygonal structures in terms of the motion of points where multiple boundaries meet. Globally, FT-type approaches, often associated with Lagrangian movement, enhance spatial resolution in 3D surfacic and 2D lineic problems using techniques derived from finite element meshing and remeshing algorithms. These efficient approaches, by nature, are well adapted to physical mechanisms correlated to interface properties and geometries. They also face challenges in managing complex topological events, especially in 3D. However, recent advances highlight their potential in computational efficiency and analysis of mobility and energy properties, with possible applications in intragranular phenomena.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Oct. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2510.21818v1

The study of mesoscopic scale microstructure evolution modeling involves the use of two primary numerical frameworks: Front-Capturing (FC) and Front-Tracking (FT) methods. These efficient approaches are well-suited for studying physical mechanisms related to interface properties and geometries, with potential applications in intragranular phenomena. Recent advances have highlighted their potential in terms of computational efficiency and analysis of mobility and energy properties. However, challenges remain in managing complex topological events, particularly in 3D simulations. In a more recent development, Lazar et al. introduced a method based on a discretized version of the MacPherson-Srolovitz relationship to simulate ideal grain growth on a surface mesh with uniform grain boundary characteristics, minimizing the need for topological changes during simulation. Additionally, Eren et al. proposed a new 3D approach based on a finite element mesh that optimizes numerical cost for modeling grain growth and allows for efficient resolution and remeshing operations using parallelized finite-element libraries. Overall, these advancements represent significant progress in the field of microstructure evolution modeling using front-tracking methods.
Created on 28 Oct. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.