Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2602.13214v1

In the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in interactive environments that demand strategic decision-making. However, evaluating the strategic capabilities of these models in a systematic manner poses a significant challenge. Traditional benchmarks for LLMs typically focus on assessing static reasoning abilities through isolated tasks, failing to capture the dynamic nature of strategic decision-making. Recent evaluations have attempted to address this by organizing LLM-vs-LLM tournaments in game-based settings. While these tournaments provide relative rankings based on transient model pools, they come with high computational costs and lack stable performance benchmarks for long-term tracking. To overcome these limitations, a scalable evaluation framework is needed that can measure LLM strategic reasoning against consistent and interpretable standards rather than relying on fluctuating peer models. In response to this challenge, a new approach called BotzoneBench has been introduced. This evaluation method anchors LLM assessment to fixed hierarchies of skill-calibrated game Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabling linear-time absolute skill measurement with stable cross-temporal interpretability. BotzoneBench operates on the established competitive infrastructure of the Botzone platform and evaluates LLMs across eight diverse games ranging from deterministic perfect-information board games to stochastic imperfect-information card games. Through a thorough analysis of 177,047 state-action pairs from five leading models, significant performance variations were uncovered, highlighting distinct strategic behaviors exhibited by different models. The top-performing LLMs demonstrated proficiency levels comparable to mid-to-high-tier specialized game AI across multiple domains. This anchored evaluation paradigm extends beyond gaming applications and can be applied to any domain with well-defined skill hierarchies. By establishing a scalable and reusable framework for assessing interactive AI capabilities, BotzoneBench represents a significant advancement in the field of AI evaluation methodology.

• - Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in interactive environments for strategic decision-making in artificial intelligence (AI).
• - Traditional benchmarks for LLMs focus on static reasoning abilities and do not capture the dynamic nature of strategic decision-making.
• - LLM-vs-LLM tournaments in game-based settings have been introduced to evaluate strategic capabilities, but they come with high computational costs and lack stable performance benchmarks.
• - BotzoneBench is a new evaluation method that anchors LLM assessment to fixed hierarchies of skill-calibrated game AI, enabling linear-time absolute skill measurement with stable cross-temporal interpretability.
• - BotzoneBench evaluates LLMs across eight diverse games and has uncovered significant performance variations among different models, demonstrating proficiency levels comparable to specialized game AI.
• - This evaluation paradigm can be applied beyond gaming applications to any domain with well-defined skill hierarchies, representing a significant advancement in AI evaluation methodology.

Summary- Big talking computers are being used more and more to make smart choices in pretend worlds with AI. - Tests for these big talking computers usually check how good they are at thinking, but not how well they can change their minds in a game. - There are contests where these big talking computers play against each other in games to see who is better at making clever moves, but it's expensive and doesn't always give fair results. - A new way of testing called BotzoneBench makes sure the big talking computers are compared fairly using set levels of skills in games, making it easier to measure how good they really are. - BotzoneBench checks the big talking computers on eight different games and finds out that some are better than others, showing they can be as good as special game-playing AI. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Big talking computers that help make smart decisions using artificial intelligence (AI). - Strategic decision-making: Making important choices based on thinking ahead and planning carefully. - Benchmarks: Standards or tests used to measure performance or compare against others. - Computational costs: The amount of time and resources needed for a computer program to run certain tasks. - Proficiency levels: How skilled or good someone or something is at doing a particular task.

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly prevalent in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). These models are designed to handle complex language tasks and have shown great potential in interactive environments that require strategic decision-making. However, evaluating the strategic capabilities of LLMs has proven to be a significant challenge for researchers. Traditional benchmarks for LLMs focus on assessing static reasoning abilities through isolated tasks, which fail to capture the dynamic nature of strategic decision-making. This limitation led to the development of new evaluation methods such as LLM-vs-LLM tournaments in game-based settings. While these tournaments provide relative rankings based on transient model pools, they come with high computational costs and lack stable performance benchmarks for long-term tracking. To address these limitations, a team of researchers introduced a new approach called BotzoneBench. This evaluation method anchors LLM assessment to fixed hierarchies of skill-calibrated game Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabling linear-time absolute skill measurement with stable cross-temporal interpretability. BotzoneBench operates on the established competitive infrastructure of the Botzone platform and evaluates LLMs across eight diverse games ranging from deterministic perfect-information board games to stochastic imperfect-information card games. The use of multiple games allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of an LLM's strategic reasoning abilities. The study analyzed 177,047 state-action pairs from five leading models and uncovered significant performance variations among them. This highlights distinct strategic behaviors exhibited by different models and emphasizes the need for a standardized evaluation framework. The top-performing LLMs demonstrated proficiency levels comparable to mid-to-high-tier specialized game AI across multiple domains. This indicates that these models possess strong strategic reasoning capabilities and can compete with specialized AI systems in various applications. One key advantage of BotzoneBench is its scalability and reusability. The framework can be applied not only in gaming applications but also in any domain with well-defined skill hierarchies. This makes it a valuable tool for assessing interactive AI capabilities in various fields. In conclusion, the introduction of BotzoneBench represents a significant advancement in the field of AI evaluation methodology. By establishing a scalable and reusable framework for assessing LLMs' strategic reasoning abilities, researchers now have a more reliable and standardized way to evaluate these models. This will ultimately lead to further advancements in the development of LLMs and their applications in interactive environments.