Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2602.24287v1

The impact of conditioning large language models on their own prior responses in multi-turn interactions is investigated by authors Jenny Y. Huang, Leshem Choshen, Ramon Astudillo, Tamara Broderick, and Jacob Andreas. The study compares the traditional full-context prompting approach with a user-turn-only prompting method that excludes previous assistant responses across various open reasoning models and a state-of-the-art model. Interestingly, the results show that removing prior assistant responses does not significantly affect response quality on many turns. This leads to a reduction in cumulative context lengths by up to 10 times. The analysis reveals that a considerable portion (36.4%) of multi-turn conversations contain self-contained prompts and many follow-up prompts can be answered using only the current user turn and previous user turns. In cases where the user-turn-only prompting outperforms full context, it is attributed to instances of context pollution where models overly rely on their past responses resulting in errors, hallucinations or stylistic inconsistencies propagating through subsequent turns. Based on these findings, the researchers propose a context-filtering approach that selectively omits assistant-side history to enhance response quality while decreasing memory consumption. This study highlights how omitting assistant history can improve performance in large language models during multi-turn interactions and emphasizes the importance of considering contextual dependencies in dialogue systems for more effective communication outcomes.

• - Authors: Jenny Y. Huang, Leshem Choshen, Ramon Astudillo, Tamara Broderick, Jacob Andreas
• - Study compares traditional full-context prompting vs user-turn-only prompting in multi-turn interactions
• - Removing prior assistant responses does not significantly affect response quality on many turns
• - Reduction in cumulative context lengths by up to 10 times observed
• - 36.4% of multi-turn conversations contain self-contained prompts
• - User-turn-only prompting can outperform full context due to context pollution causing errors, hallucinations, or stylistic inconsistencies
• - Proposal of a context-filtering approach to enhance response quality and decrease memory consumption

Summary- The study looked at different ways of helping people talk to computers. - They found that sometimes it's better for the computer to only listen to what the person says, instead of remembering everything from before. - Taking away old computer responses didn't make a big difference in how good the new responses were most of the time. - Sometimes, making the computer remember less information can make it work faster and better. - They suggest a new way for computers to understand and respond better in conversations. Definitions- Authors: People who write books or do research. - Prompting: Giving hints or suggestions to help someone do something. - Interactions: When two things affect each other or work together.

In recent years, there has been a surge in the development of large language models (LLMs) that have shown impressive performance on various natural language processing tasks. These models are trained on massive amounts of text data and can generate human-like responses to prompts given by users. However, one major challenge in using LLMs for dialogue systems is their ability to maintain coherence and consistency across multiple turns of conversation. To address this issue, a team of researchers from Stanford University and Google Brain conducted a study titled "The impact of conditioning large language models on their own prior responses in multi-turn interactions". The paper was authored by Jenny Y. Huang, Leshem Choshen, Ramon Astudillo, Tamara Broderick, and Jacob Andreas. In this research paper, the authors investigate how conditioning LLMs on their own previous responses affects response quality in multi-turn interactions. Traditionally, LLMs are conditioned on full-context prompts which include both the user's current turn as well as all previous assistant responses. However, the researchers propose an alternative approach called user-turn-only prompting where only the current user turn is used as input to the model while excluding previous assistant responses. This method aims to reduce context length and memory consumption while still maintaining high-quality responses. To compare these two approaches, the researchers evaluated them across various open reasoning models and a state-of-the-art model called GPT-3. Surprisingly, they found that removing prior assistant responses did not significantly affect response quality on many turns. In fact, it led to a reduction in cumulative context lengths by up to 10 times. Upon further analysis of multi-turn conversations between humans and machines, the researchers discovered that a considerable portion (36.4%) contained self-contained prompts where no information from previous assistant responses was needed to generate an appropriate response. They also found that many follow-up prompts could be answered using only the current user turn and previous user turns. This suggests that LLMs have the ability to understand and maintain contextual dependencies without relying on previous assistant responses. In cases where the user-turn-only prompting outperformed full context, it was attributed to instances of "context pollution" where models overly rely on their past responses resulting in errors, hallucinations, or stylistic inconsistencies propagating through subsequent turns. This highlights the importance of considering contextual dependencies in dialogue systems for more effective communication outcomes. Based on these findings, the researchers propose a context-filtering approach that selectively omits assistant-side history to enhance response quality while decreasing memory consumption. This method aims to strike a balance between using relevant context information and avoiding potential errors caused by over-reliance on previous assistant responses. Overall, this study sheds light on how omitting assistant history can improve performance in large language models during multi-turn interactions. It also emphasizes the importance of considering contextual dependencies in dialogue systems for more effective communication outcomes. With further research and development, this approach could lead to more human-like and coherent conversations with virtual assistants and chatbots.