, , , ,
In the realm of software engineering, Large Language Model (LLM)-powered agents have showcased impressive capabilities in automating tasks such as static bug fixing. This has been demonstrated by benchmarks like SWE-bench. However, the real-world scenario of developing mature software involves intricate requirement changes and long-term feature iterations. Traditional one-shot repair paradigms fail to capture this process. To address this gap, the innovative SWE-CI benchmark has been introduced, marking a shift in the evaluation paradigm for code generation from short-term functional correctness to long-term maintainability. SWE-CI stands out as the first repository-level benchmark built upon the Continuous Integration loop. Its aim is to assess how well agents can sustain code quality throughout extended periods of evolution. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks derived from real-world code repositories with an average evolution history spanning 233 days and 71 consecutive commits. SWE-CI challenges agents to systematically resolve these tasks through multiple rounds of analysis and coding iterations. By focusing on dynamic maintainability rather than static fixes, SWE-CI offers valuable insights into an agent's ability to adapt and evolve code over time. The motivation behind designing benchmarks like SWE-CI stems from the understanding that software quality naturally degrades over time as maintenance progresses. With maintenance activities accounting for a significant portion of total software lifecycle costs, there is a pressing need to evaluate models based on their capacity to maintain code effectively. The existing snapshot-style evaluation protocols used in benchmarks like HumanEval and LiveCodeBench overlook the crucial aspect of long-term code evolution. Agents that produce quick fixes may pass initial tests but struggle when faced with evolving requirements and changing interfaces. Through extensive experiments involving more than 10 billion tokens, it was observed that while state-of-the-art models excel in functional correctness tasks, they encounter challenges in sustaining code quality over prolonged evolution periods. The introduction of EvoScore as a proxy metric in SWE-CI enables a nuanced assessment of an agent's coding capabilities by measuring its performance on future modifications. This comprehensive evaluation approach sheds light on the distinctive diagnostic value of SWE-CI in gauging an agent's ability to maintain codebase integrity amidst evolving requirements. In conclusion, SWE-CI represents a groundbreaking initiative in evaluating LLM-based agents' long-term coding proficiency through continuous integration processes. By emphasizing maintainability alongside functional correctness, this benchmark offers valuable insights into how well agents can adapt and evolve codebases over extended periods of time.
- - Large Language Model (LLM)-powered agents have shown impressive capabilities in automating tasks like static bug fixing
- - Traditional one-shot repair paradigms are insufficient for handling long-term software development with requirement changes and feature iterations
- - SWE-CI benchmark shifts the evaluation paradigm from short-term functional correctness to long-term maintainability in code generation
- - SWE-CI is the first repository-level benchmark based on Continuous Integration, assessing agents' ability to sustain code quality over extended periods of evolution
- - The benchmark comprises 100 tasks from real-world repositories with an average evolution history of 233 days and 71 consecutive commits
- - SWE-CI focuses on dynamic maintainability, offering insights into an agent's ability to adapt and evolve code over time
- - EvoScore in SWE-CI allows nuanced assessment of coding capabilities by measuring performance on future modifications
- - State-of-the-art models excel in functional correctness but struggle with sustaining code quality over prolonged evolution periods
Summary- Big smart computer programs have gotten really good at fixing mistakes in computer code.
- The old way of fixing mistakes all at once doesn't work well for making software that changes a lot.
- A new test called SWE-CI looks at how well these programs can keep code working well as it changes over time.
- This test uses real tasks from computer projects and sees how the programs handle them over many days and changes.
- SWE-CI helps us see if these programs can keep up with changing code and make it better over time.
Definitions- Large Language Model (LLM): A big, powerful computer program that can do many tasks on its own.
- Static bug fixing: Correcting errors or mistakes in computer code without running the program.
- Continuous Integration (CI): A practice in software development where changes are frequently integrated into the main project to prevent issues.
- Maintainability: How easy it is to keep something working well over time, like software code.
Introduction
In recent years, Large Language Model (LLM)-powered agents have shown impressive capabilities in automating tasks such as static bug fixing. This has been demonstrated by benchmarks like SWE-bench. However, the real-world scenario of developing mature software involves intricate requirement changes and long-term feature iterations. Traditional one-shot repair paradigms fail to capture this process, leading to a gap in evaluating an agent's coding proficiency over extended periods of time.
To address this issue, researchers have introduced the innovative SWE-CI benchmark. This benchmark marks a shift in the evaluation paradigm for code generation from short-term functional correctness to long-term maintainability. It is the first repository-level benchmark built upon the Continuous Integration loop and aims to assess how well agents can sustain code quality throughout extended periods of evolution.
The Motivation Behind SWE-CI
The motivation behind designing benchmarks like SWE-CI stems from the understanding that software quality naturally degrades over time as maintenance progresses. With maintenance activities accounting for a significant portion of total software lifecycle costs, there is a pressing need to evaluate models based on their capacity to maintain code effectively.
Existing snapshot-style evaluation protocols used in benchmarks like HumanEval and LiveCodeBench overlook the crucial aspect of long-term code evolution. Agents that produce quick fixes may pass initial tests but struggle when faced with evolving requirements and changing interfaces.
The Importance of Long-Term Code Evolution
Through extensive experiments involving more than 10 billion tokens, it was observed that while state-of-the-art models excel in functional correctness tasks, they encounter challenges in sustaining code quality over prolonged evolution periods. This highlights the importance of evaluating an agent's ability to adapt and evolve codebases over extended periods of time.
What Sets SWE-CI Apart?
SWE-CI stands out as the first repository-level benchmark built upon the Continuous Integration loop. Its aim is to assess how well agents can sustain code quality throughout extended periods of evolution. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks derived from real-world code repositories with an average evolution history spanning 233 days and 71 consecutive commits.
A Shift in Evaluation Paradigm
The introduction of SWE-CI marks a shift in the evaluation paradigm for code generation from short-term functional correctness to long-term maintainability. By focusing on dynamic maintainability rather than static fixes, SWE-CI offers valuable insights into an agent's ability to adapt and evolve code over time.
EvoScore: A Comprehensive Metric
One of the key features of SWE-CI is the introduction of EvoScore as a proxy metric. This metric enables a nuanced assessment of an agent's coding capabilities by measuring its performance on future modifications. It takes into account not only initial fixes but also subsequent changes made to the codebase, providing a more comprehensive evaluation approach.
The Results
Through extensive experiments involving more than 10 billion tokens, it was observed that while state-of-the-art models excel in functional correctness tasks, they encounter challenges in sustaining code quality over prolonged evolution periods. This highlights the importance of evaluating an agent's ability to adapt and evolve codebases over extended periods of time.
Conclusion
In conclusion, SWE-CI represents a groundbreaking initiative in evaluating LLM-based agents' long-term coding proficiency through continuous integration processes. By emphasizing maintainability alongside functional correctness, this benchmark offers valuable insights into how well agents can adapt and evolve codebases over extended periods of time. With its unique approach and comprehensive metrics, SWE-CI provides researchers with a powerful tool for assessing an agent's coding capabilities in real-world scenarios.