Cosmological constraints from the DESI DR1 joint power spectrum and bispectrum analysis

AI-generated keywords: Cosmological parameter constraints

AI-generated Key Points

  • Cosmological parameter constraints derived from DESI DR1 galaxy clustering data using the ShapeFit framework
  • First ShapeFit cosmological inference results based on the bispectrum of DESI DR1
  • Constraints on crucial parameters such as matter density ($Ω_m=0.310\pm0.012$) and Hubble constant ($H_0=[68.92\pm0.97]\,\mathrm{km\, s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}$)
  • Significant enhancement in constraint precision for fluctuations' amplitude by integrating the bispectrum into analysis
  • Exploration of evolving dark energy equation-of-state $w_0w_a$ and sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_ν$
  • Consistency with standard $Λ$CDM model assumptions and expectations for dark energy equation-of-state and neutrino mass within a 2σ range
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. Novell-Masot, H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, F. J. Castander, T. Claybaugh, S. Cole, A. de la Macorra, J. Della Costa, S. Ferraro, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gaztañaga, S. Gontcho A Gontcho, A. X. Gonzalez-Morales, G. Gutierrez, J. Guy, C. Hahn, H. K. Herrera-Alcantar, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett, M. Ishak, J. Jimenez, R. Joyce, R. Kehoe, D. Kirkby, A. Kremin, C. Lamman, L. Le Guillou, M. Manera, A. Meisner, R. Miquel, S. Nadathur, G. Niz, W. J. Percival, I. Pérez-Ràfols, G. Rossi, L. Samushia, E. Sanchez, E. F. Schlafly, D. Schlegel, M. Schubnell, J. Silber, D. Sprayberry, G. Tarlé, B. A. Weaver, C. Zhao, R. Zhou

arXiv: 2603.19356v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
26 pages, 5 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We derive cosmological parameter constraints from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 1 (DR1) galaxy clustering data, based on a joint full-shape analysis of the power spectrum multipoles and the bispectrum monopole using the ShapeFit framework. This is the follow-up of our previous work, in which we obtained for the first time constraints on the ShapeFit parameters using the bispectrum of DESI DR1. Here we present the first ShapeFit cosmological inference results using the bispectrum of DESI DR1. We recover values for the matter density parameter and Hubble constant of respectively $Ω_m=0.310\pm0.012$ and $H_0=[68.92\pm0.97]\,\mathrm{km\, s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$, consistent with previous results from the full DESI DR1 dataset that did not use the bispectrum signal. The inclusion of the bispectrum significantly tightens the constraints on the amplitude of fluctuations, reducing the error-bars in $\ln(A_s\times10^{10})$ by approximately 20\%, compared to using the power spectrum alone. We also explore extended cosmological models by performing fits for the evolving dark energy equation of state $w_0w_a$, and the sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_ν$. In these cases, we obtain constraints slightly larger than the ones from previous works from the DESI collaboration, due to not combining the full-shape results with other probes in all tracers. We find no strong evidence of deviations from standard $Λ$CDM, with the dark energy equation-of-state remaining within 2$σ$ from a cosmological constant $Λ$, and the neutrino mass being consistent with the normal hierarchy, $\sum m_ν<0.1\,[eV]$ at 95\% confidence limit. These constraints are broadly consistent with other DESI DR1 analyses, thus validating the robustness of the ShapeFit compression approach and the inclusion of the bispectrum for cosmological inference.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Mar. 2026

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2603.19356v1

, , , , We present cosmological parameter constraints derived from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 1 (DR1) galaxy clustering data using the ShapeFit framework. Our analysis includes a comprehensive examination of the power spectrum multipoles and bispectrum monopole, building upon our previous work where we established constraints on ShapeFit parameters using the bispectrum of DESI DR1. The key highlight of our research is the first ShapeFit cosmological inference results based on the bispectrum of DESI DR1, which reveals values for crucial parameters such as matter density ($Ω_m=0.310\pm0.012$) and Hubble constant ($H_0=[68.92\pm0.97]\,\mathrm{km\, s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}$). These results align with earlier findings from analyses of the full DESI DR1 dataset that did not incorporate the bispectrum signal. By integrating the bispectrum into our analysis, we observe a significant enhancement in constraint precision for fluctuations' amplitude, leading to a notable reduction in error-bars in $\ln(A_s\times10^{10})$ by approximately 20% compared to relying solely on power spectrum data. Furthermore, we extend our exploration to encompass more intricate cosmological models by conducting fits for evolving dark energy equation-of-state $w_0w_a$ and sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_ν$. While our constraints slightly surpass those from prior works by the DESI collaboration due to not amalgamating full-shape results with other probes across all tracers, we find no compelling evidence indicating deviations from standard $Λ$CDM model assumptions. Our analysis reveals that both dark energy equation-of-state and neutrino mass remain consistent with expectations within a 2σ range from a cosmological constant $Λ$ and normal hierarchy for neutrino mass distribution respectively ($\sum m_ν<0.1\,[eV]$ at 95% confidence limit). These outcomes are broadly in line with other DESI DR1 analyses, underscoring the robustness of employing ShapeFit compression methodology alongside incorporating bispectrum data for precise cosmological inference.
Created on 24 Mar. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.