The radial velocity stability for reference sources in the MWISP CO survey

AI-generated keywords: Radial velocity stability CO spectral lines MWISP survey Cross-correlation method Pointing errors

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study title: "The Radial Velocity Stability for Reference Sources in the MWISP CO Survey"
  • Authors: Lixia Yuan, Ji Yang, Min Fang, Shaobo Zhang, Dengrong Lu, Jixian Sun
  • Methodology: Utilization of cross-correlation method to analyze approximately 10,000 CO spectra from six reference sources observed over a ten-year period
  • Results:
  • Standard deviations ($σ$) of measured velocity shifts range from 0.03 to 0.23 km s$^{-1}$ for $^{12}$CO lines and 0.03 to 0.16 km s$^{-1}$ for $^{13}$CO lines
  • Larger shifts in velocity associated with broader linewidths and more significant differences between monthly and long-term variations
  • Stronger correlation between velocity shifts of $^{12}$CO and $^{13}$CO lines
  • Observations:
  • Systematic changes across different Azimuth-Elevation ranges affecting velocity shifts
  • Changes vary among sources and tied to their extended velocity fields
  • Causes of increased velocity shifts:
  • Pointing errors, particularly affecting reference sources with higher velocity gradients
  • Contribution to future studies:
  • Provision of high signal-to-noise, velocity-aligned template spectra for each source within the MWISP survey context
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lixia Yuan, Ji Yang, Min Fang, Shaobo Zhang, Dengrong Lu, Jixian Sun

arXiv: 2603.19748v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
22 pages, 17 figures, accepted to RAA

Abstract: To assess the velocity stability of CO spectral lines in the Milky Way Imaging Scroll Painting (MWISP) survey, we employ a cross-correlation method to measure velocity shifts across $\sim$ 10,000 CO spectra from six reference sources observed over the ten-year duration of the survey. The standard deviations ($σ$) of these measured velocity shifts range from 0.03 to 0.23 km s$^{-1}$ for their $^{12}$CO lines and 0.03 to 0.16 km s$^{-1}$ for $^{13}$CO lines. We find that larger shifts are associated with broader linewidths, more pronounced differences between monthly and long-term variations, and a stronger correlation between velocity shifts of $^{12}$CO and $^{13}$CO lines. By examining the relation of velocity shifts with the Azimuth-Elevation of the telescope, as well as the velocity fields of these extended sources, we find that the velocity shifts exhibit systematic changes across different Azimuth-Elevation ranges. The patterns and amplitudes of these changes vary among sources and are closely linked to the extended velocity fields of sources. This indicates that the increased velocity shifts are primarily caused by pointing errors, which are more sensitive to reference sources with higher velocity gradients. We also provide high signal-to-noise, velocity-aligned template spectra for reference sources.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Mar. 2026

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2603.19748v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "The Radial Velocity Stability for Reference Sources in the MWISP CO Survey," authors Lixia Yuan, Ji Yang, Min Fang, Shaobo Zhang, Dengrong Lu, and Jixian Sun investigate the stability of CO spectral lines in the Milky Way Imaging Scroll Painting (MWISP) survey. They utilize a cross-correlation method to analyze approximately 10,000 CO spectra from six reference sources observed over a ten-year period. The results reveal that standard deviations ($σ$) of measured velocity shifts range from 0.03 to 0.23 km s$^{-1}$ for $^{12}$CO lines and 0.03 to 0.16 km s$^{-1}$ for $^{13}$CO lines. Notably, larger shifts in velocity are associated with broader linewidths and more significant differences between monthly and long-term variations. The study also identifies a stronger correlation between velocity shifts of $^{12}$CO and $^{13}$CO lines. Furthermore, by examining how velocity shifts relate to the Azimuth-Elevation of the telescope and the velocity fields of extended sources, systematic changes across different Azimuth-Elevation ranges are observed. These changes vary among sources and are closely tied to their extended velocity fields. The findings suggest that increased velocity shifts are primarily caused by pointing errors, particularly affecting reference sources with higher velocity gradients. To aid future studies utilizing these reference sources within the MWISP survey context, the authors provide high signal-to-noise, velocity-aligned template spectra for each source. This comprehensive analysis enhances our understanding of radial velocity stability in CO spectral lines within astronomical observations and sheds light on factors influencing such stability in astronomical observations.
Created on 24 Mar. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.