Robustness of C/O and mean molecular weight under disequilibrium chemistry

Authors: Bethany Burt, Kevin Heng, Alex Cridland, Shang-Min Tsai

arXiv: 2610.24583v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
License: CC BY 4.0
Summaries already available in other languages: fr

Abstract: Transmission spectroscopy increasingly reduces exoplanet spectra to derived compositional metrics, such as C/O, O/H, and mean molecular weight (MMW), but these quantities do not carry molecular abundance uncertainties in the same way. We assessed the reliability of these metrics for hot Jupiters and sub-Neptunes, by combining analytic uncertainty propagation with photochemical VULCAN forward models and representative published retrieval constraints. Propagating molecular abundance uncertainties produced substantially larger fractional uncertainties in elemental abundance ratios than in MMW. The fractional uncertainties in C/O and O/H were typically comparable to the inferred ratios, whereas the fractional uncertainty in MMW was more than two orders of magnitude smaller in H2/He-dominated atmospheres. Photochemistry and vertical mixing redistributed individual molecules but produced only minor changes in C/O and MMW at the pressures probed by transmission spectroscopy. C/O remains an important diagnostic of atmospheric chemistry and planetary formation history, but its interpretation requires careful uncertainty propagation. Mean molecular weight may provide a comparatively stable population-level diagnostic for linking observable atmospheres to bulk composition, especially across the sub-Neptune radius valley.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Oct. 2026

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2610.24583v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.