A Dust-Obscured Massive Maximum-Starburst Galaxy at a Redshift of 6.34

Authors: Dominik A. Riechers (Cornell, Caltech), C. M. Bradford, D. L. Clements, C. D. Dowell, I. Perez-Fournon, R. J. Ivison, C. Bridge, A. Conley, Hai Fu, J. D. Vieira, J. Wardlow, J. Calanog, A. Cooray, P. Hurley, R. Neri, J. Kamenetzky, J. E. Aguirre, B. Altieri, V. Arumugam, D. J. Benford, M. Bethermin, J. Bock, D. Burgarella, A. Cabrera-Lavers, S. C. Chapman, P. Cox, J. S. Dunlop, L. Earle, D. Farrah, P. Ferrero, A. Franceschini, R. Gavazzi, J. Glenn, E. A. Gonzalez Solares, M. A. Gurwell, M. Halpern, E. Hatziminaoglou, A. Hyde, E. Ibar, A. Kovacs, M. Krips, R. E. Lupu, P. R. Maloney, P. Martinez-Navajas, H. Matsuhara, E. J. Murphy, B. J. Naylor, H. T. Nguyen, S. J. Oliver, A. Omont, M. J. Page, G. Petitpas, N. Rangwala, I. G. Roseboom, D. Scott, A. J. Smith, J. G. Staguhn, A. Streblyanska, A. P. Thomson, I. Valtchanov, M. Viero, L. Wang, M. Zemcov, J. Zmuidzinas

Nature 496:329-333,2013
arXiv: 1304.4256v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
35 pages, 19 figures, 5 tables, including Supplementary Information (version formatted by the authors). To appear in Nature. Under press embargo until 18:00 London time/13:00 US Eastern Time on 17 April 2013

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1304.4256v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
Massive present-day early-type galaxies, such as elliptical and lenticular galaxies, are believed to have gained their stellar mass and heavy elements through intense starbursts in the most massive dark matter halos at early epochs. However, it is still unknown how soon after the Big Bang these massive starburst progenitors existed. The redshift distribution of dusty, massive starbursts has long been suspected to be biased towards lower redshifts due to selection effects. Recent findings have confirmed this suspicion by detecting systems out to a redshift of z~5. In this study, researchers report the identification of a massive starburst galaxy at an even higher redshift of 6.34 using a submillimeter color-selection technique. The redshift was determined with certainty through the analysis of molecular and atomic fine structure cooling lines. The measurements revealed that this galaxy contains a highly excited and chemically evolved interstellar medium with a mass of at least a hundred billion solar masses. This constitutes at least 40% of the baryonic mass of the galaxy. The star formation rate in this "maximum starburst" galaxy is more than 2,000 times that of our Milky Way, making it one of the highest observed rates at any epoch. Despite the overall decrease in cosmic star formation towards higher redshifts, this discovery suggests that environments capable of forming such massive and intense starbursts already existed as early as 880 million years after the Big Bang. This finding provides important insights into the early universe's ability to produce and sustain extreme levels of star formation in galaxies. It highlights the existence of mature environments capable of hosting these intense starbursts relatively soon after cosmic dawn. Further studies will continue to explore the formation mechanisms and evolutionary processes involved in these early massive starburst galaxies, shedding light on their role in shaping galactic evolution throughout cosmic history.
AI-generated keywords: Early Universe Starbursts Massive Galaxies Redshift Interstellar Medium

AI-generated Key Points

  • Massive present-day early-type galaxies gained their stellar mass and heavy elements through intense starbursts in the most massive dark matter halos at early epochs
  • The redshift distribution of dusty, massive starbursts is biased towards lower redshifts due to selection effects
  • Researchers have identified a massive starburst galaxy at a redshift of 6.34 using a submillimeter color-selection technique
  • The galaxy contains a highly excited and chemically evolved interstellar medium with a mass of at least a hundred billion solar masses, constituting at least 40% of the baryonic mass of the galaxy
  • The star formation rate in this galaxy is more than 2,000 times that of our Milky Way, making it one of the highest observed rates at any epoch
  • Environments capable of forming such massive and intense starbursts already existed as early as 880 million years after the Big Bang
  • This finding provides important insights into the early universe's ability to produce and sustain extreme levels of star formation in galaxies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Massive present-day early-type (elliptical and lenticular) galaxies probably gained the bulk of their stellar mass and heavy elements through intense, dust-enshrouded starbursts - that is, increased rates of star formation - in the most massive dark matter halos at early epochs. However, it remains unknown how soon after the Big Bang such massive starburst progenitors exist. The measured redshift distribution of dusty, massive starbursts has long been suspected to be biased low in redshift owing to selection effects, as confirmed by recent findings of systems out to redshift z~5. Here we report the identification of a massive starburst galaxy at redshift 6.34 through a submillimeter color-selection technique. We unambiguously determined the redshift from a suite of molecular and atomic fine structure cooling lines. These measurements reveal a hundred billion solar masses of highly excited, chemically evolved interstellar medium in this galaxy, which constitutes at least 40% of the baryonic mass. A "maximum starburst" converts the gas into stars at a rate more than 2,000 times that of the Milky Way, a rate among the highest observed at any epoch. Despite the overall downturn of cosmic star formation towards the highest redshifts, it seems that environments mature enough to form the most massive, intense starbursts existed at least as early as 880 million years after the Big Bang.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Apr. 2013

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.