Probabilistic multi-catalogue positional cross-match

Authors: F. -X. Pineau, S. Derriere, C. Motch, F. J. Carrera, F. Genova, L. Michel, B. Mingo, A. Mints, A. Nebot Gómez-Morán, S. R. Rosen, A. Ruiz Camuñas

arXiv: 1609.00818v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
28 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in A&A

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1609.00818v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This paper presents a statistical framework for multi-catalogue cross-correlation and cross-identification, focusing primarily on the astrometric part of the identification process. The authors emphasize the importance of considering both astrometric and photometric data in order to achieve proper identification. They propose using the Chi (or Chi-square) test with 2(n-1) degrees of freedom to select matching candidates in n catalogues, referring to this cross-match as a chi-match. To merge the astrometric probabilities with photometric likelihoods, they employ Bayes' formula and consider exhaustive sets of hypotheses based on combinatorial analysis. They estimate the expected numbers of spurious associations by calculating the volume of the Chi-test domain of acceptance, represented as a 2(n-1)-dimensional acceptance ellipsoid. Priors for these numbers are derived using a frequentist approach that relies on simple geometrical considerations. Likelihoods in this framework are based on normalized Rayleigh, Chi, and Poisson distributions over the Chi-test acceptance domain. The theoretical results are validated through the generation and cross-matching of synthetic catalogues. The authors highlight that their results do not depend on the order used to cross-correlate the catalogues. They apply their formalism to construct multi-wavelength catalogues for the ARCHES (Astronomical Resource Cross-matching for High Energy Studies) project and make their cross-matching engine publicly available through a multi-purpose web interface. Additionally, they plan to integrate it into CDS XMatch Service in future developments. Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive statistical framework for multi catalogue positional cross match which offers insights into astrometric probabilities and their integration with photometric likelihoods.
AI-generated keywords: Multi-catalogue cross-correlation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Statistical framework for multi-catalogue cross-correlation and cross-identification
  • Emphasizes the importance of considering both astrometric and photometric data
  • Proposes using Chi (or Chi-square) test with 2(n-1) degrees of freedom for matching candidates
  • Merges astrometric probabilities with photometric likelihoods using Bayes' formula
  • Estimates expected numbers of spurious associations by calculating volume of Chi-test domain of acceptance
  • Derives priors for spurious associations using a frequentist approach based on geometrical considerations
  • Validates theoretical results through generation and cross-matching of synthetic catalogues
  • Results do not depend on the order used to cross-correlate the catalogues
  • Applies formalism to construct multi-wavelength catalogues for ARCHES project
  • Makes cross-matching engine publicly available through a multi-purpose web interface
  • Plans to integrate into CDS XMatch Service in future developments
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We lay the foundations of a statistical framework for multi-catalogue cross-correlation and cross-identification based on explicit simplified catalogue models. A proper identification process should rely on both astrometric and photometric data. Under some conditions, the astrometric part and the photometric part can be processed separately and merged a posteriori to provide a single global probability of identification. The present paper addresses almost exclusively the astrometrical part and specifies the proper probabilities to be merged with photometric likelihoods. To select matching candidates in n catalogues, we used the Chi (or, indifferently, the Chi-square) test with 2(n-1) degrees of freedom. We thus call this cross-match a chi-match. In order to use Bayes' formula, we considered exhaustive sets of hypotheses based on combinatorial analysis. The volume of the Chi-test domain of acceptance -- a 2(n-1)-dimensional acceptance ellipsoid -- is used to estimate the expected numbers of spurious associations. We derived priors for those numbers using a frequentist approach relying on simple geometrical considerations. Likelihoods are based on standard Rayleigh, Chi and Poisson distributions that we normalized over the Chi-test acceptance domain. We validated our theoretical results by generating and cross-matching synthetic catalogues. The results we obtain do not depend on the order used to cross-correlate the catalogues. We applied the formalism described in the present paper to build the multi-wavelength catalogues used for the science cases of the ARCHES (Astronomical Resource Cross-matching for High Energy Studies) project. Our cross-matching engine is publicly available through a multi-purpose web interface. In a longer term, we plan to integrate this tool into the CDS XMatch Service.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Sep. 2016

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.