Combining Neural Networks and Tree Search for Task and Motion Planning in Challenging Environments

Authors: Chris Paxton, Vasumathi Raman, Gregory D. Hager, Marin Kobilarov

8 pgs, currently in peer review. Video: https://youtu.be/MM2U_SGMtk8

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1703.07887v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Combining Neural Networks and Tree Search for Task and Motion Planning in Challenging Environments" explores the problem of task and motion planning in complex dynamic environments. The authors propose a methodology that utilizes reinforcement learning and deep neural networks to learn low-level control policies and task-level option policies. The objective is to generate task plans based on a set of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) constraints and a reward function. One of the main challenges in this setting is the need to explore future scenarios in a complex and interactive environment. To address this, the authors integrate Monte Carlo Tree Search with hierarchical neural net control policies trained on expressive LTL specifications. This combination allows for efficient exploration of possible outcomes. The paper investigates the ability of neural networks to learn both LTL constraints and control policies. The authors demonstrate their approach in a simulated autonomous driving scenario, where a vehicle must navigate through traffic, avoid collisions, and navigate intersections while adhering to predefined rules of the road. Overall, this research contributes to the field of task and motion planning by leveraging deep neural networks and reinforcement learning techniques to generate effective task plans in complex environments. The integration of Monte Carlo Tree Search enhances exploration capabilities, enabling better decision-making in dynamic scenarios.
AI-generated keywords: Task Planning Motion Planning Neural Networks Tree Search Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper explores task and motion planning in complex dynamic environments.
  • The authors propose a methodology that combines reinforcement learning and deep neural networks.
  • The objective is to generate task plans based on Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) constraints and a reward function.
  • Monte Carlo Tree Search is integrated with hierarchical neural net control policies for efficient exploration.
  • The paper investigates the ability of neural networks to learn LTL constraints and control policies.
  • The approach is demonstrated in a simulated autonomous driving scenario.
  • Overall, the research contributes to task and motion planning by leveraging deep neural networks and reinforcement learning techniques.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We consider task and motion planning in complex dynamic environments for problems expressed in terms of a set of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) constraints, and a reward function. We propose a methodology based on reinforcement learning that employs deep neural networks to learn low-level control policies as well as task-level option policies. A major challenge in this setting, both for neural network approaches and classical planning, is the need to explore future worlds of a complex and interactive environment. To this end, we integrate Monte Carlo Tree Search with hierarchical neural net control policies trained on expressive LTL specifications. This paper investigates the ability of neural networks to learn both LTL constraints and control policies in order to generate task plans in complex environments. We demonstrate our approach in a simulated autonomous driving setting, where a vehicle must drive down a road in traffic, avoid collisions, and navigate an intersection, all while obeying given rules of the road.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Mar. 2017

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.