AI summary · arXiv: 1708.00247v2 · cs.IR

Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: A survey

Hiteshwar Kumar Azad, Akshay Deepak

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 01 Aug. 2017 Information Processing & Management, 2019 43 pages, 5 figures, 10 tables License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Query expansion (QE) techniques in information retrieval (IR) have been studied from 1960 to 2017
  • QE is important for improving searches on the Internet due to the vast amount of information and limited keywords
  • The primary objective of QE is to add meaningful terms to a user's initial query
  • QE has applications in personalized social document analysis, question answering systems, cross-language IR, information filtering, and multimedia IR
  • Dedicated conferences like TREC and CLEF focus on IR and provide platforms for researchers to present findings on QE techniques
  • The authors analyze QE techniques based on core methodologies, data sources used, weighting and ranking methodologies employed, user participation aspects, and applications
  • The paper offers insights into the evolution of QE techniques over time and provides a comprehensive understanding of its applications in IR.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Query expansion techniques information retrieval survey Hiteshwar Kumar Azad Akshay Deepak

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of query expansion (QE) techniques in the field of information retrieval (IR) from 1960 to 2017. The authors, Hiteshwar Kumar Azad and Akshay Deepak, highlight the significance of QE in improving searches on the Internet. With the ever-increasing size of the web and the challenge of extracting relevant information using only a few keywords, QE has become crucial for efficient information retrieval. The primary objective of QE is to reformulate a user's initial query by adding additional meaningful terms that have similar significance. This process has attracted significant attention from researchers and has found applications in various domains such as personalized social document analysis, question answering systems, cross-language IR, information filtering, and multimedia IR. The prominence of research in QE has been further enhanced by dedicated conferences like TREC (Text Information Retrieval Conference) and CLEF (Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum), which focus on IR. These conferences provide platforms for researchers to present their findings and exchange ideas related to QE techniques. In this survey paper, the authors analyze QE techniques based on core methodologies, data sources used, weighting and ranking methodologies employed, user participation aspects, and applications. By examining these factors across different studies conducted between 1960 and 2017, the authors aim to identify similarities and differences in QE approaches. The paper provides valuable insights into the evolution of QE techniques over time and offers a comprehensive understanding of its applications in IR. With its detailed analysis spanning several decades <fd>,</fd> this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers interested in exploring or further advancing QE techniques for effective information retrieval.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.