AI summary · arXiv: 1709.00698v3 · cs.HC

A survey on haptic technologies for mobile augmented reality

Carlos Bermejo, Pan Hui

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 03 Sep. 2017 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Survey on haptic technologies for mobile augmented reality
  • Focus on human-computer interaction in MAR applications with emphasis on haptic feedback
  • Categorization of haptic devices into cutaneous/tactile and kinesthetic groups
  • Examination of wearable haptic devices within each category for enhancing AR experiences
  • Discussion on future paths for incorporating haptic feedback into MAR applications and addressing challenges
  • Importance of understanding human-computer interaction and exploring innovative haptic technologies for immersive AR experiences on mobile platforms

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Haptic Technologies

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
A survey on haptic technologies for mobile augmented reality. This comprehensive survey delves into the research issues surrounding human-computer interaction in Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) applications with a particular emphasis on haptic feedback. The authors explore human sensing capabilities relevant to AR applications before categorizing haptic devices into cutaneous/tactile (touch-based) and kinesthetic (motion-based) groups. They then examine wearable haptic devices within each category to assess their potential for enhancing AR experiences. The paper concludes by discussing future paths for incorporating haptic feedback into MAR applications while addressing associated challenges. By expanding our understanding of human-computer interaction in this context and exploring innovative haptic technologies, we can unlock new possibilities for immersive AR experiences on mobile platforms.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.