Green AI

Authors: Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A. Smith, Oren Etzioni

12 pages

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1907.10597v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their paper "Green AI," authors Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A. Smith, and Oren Etzioni address the pressing issue of the rapidly increasing computational requirements in deep learning research. They highlight how these computations have been doubling every few months, leading to a staggering 300,000x increase from 2012 to 2018. This exponential growth not only poses environmental concerns due to the large carbon footprint associated with such computations but also creates financial barriers for individuals in academia, particularly those from emerging economies. The authors propose a practical solution: making efficiency a key evaluation criterion for research alongside traditional metrics like accuracy. Additionally, they suggest incorporating the financial cost or "price tag" of developing, training, and running models as a baseline for exploring more efficient methods. The ultimate goal of this approach is to make AI more sustainable and inclusive by enabling anyone with access to basic resources—such as an undergraduate student with a laptop—to engage in high-quality research. The concept of "Green AI" is gaining traction at institutions like the Allen Institute for AI, signaling a shift towards more environmentally conscious and accessible practices within the field of artificial intelligence.
AI-generated keywords: Green AI computational requirements deep learning research environmental concerns financial barriers

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors address the issue of rapidly increasing computational requirements in deep learning research
  • Computation requirements have been doubling every few months, leading to a 300,000x increase from 2012 to 2018
  • Environmental concerns and financial barriers for individuals in academia are highlighted
  • Proposal to make efficiency a key evaluation criterion alongside traditional metrics like accuracy
  • Suggestion to incorporate the financial cost of developing, training, and running models as a baseline for exploring more efficient methods
  • Goal is to make AI more sustainable and inclusive by enabling anyone with basic resources to engage in high-quality research
  • "Green AI" concept gaining traction at institutions like the Allen Institute for AI
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: The computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months, resulting in an estimated 300,000x increase from 2012 to 2018 [2]. These computations have a surprisingly large carbon footprint [38]. Ironically, deep learning was inspired by the human brain, which is remarkably energy efficient. Moreover, the financial cost of the computations can make it difficult for academics, students, and researchers from emerging economies to engage in deep learning research. This position paper advocates a practical solution by making efficiency an evaluation criterion for research alongside accuracy and related measures. In addition, we propose reporting the financial cost or "price tag" of developing, training, and running models to provide baselines for the investigation of increasingly efficient methods. Our goal is to make AI both greener and more inclusive---enabling any inspired undergraduate with a laptop to write high-quality research papers. Green AI is an emerging focus at the Allen Institute for AI.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jul. 2019

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.