Catching up with trends: The changing landscape of political discussions on twitter in 2014 and 2019

Authors: Avinash Tulasi, Kanay Gupta, Omkar Gurjar, Sathvik Sanjeev Buggana, Paras Mehan, Arun Balaji Buduru, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1909.07144v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Abstract: The advent of 4G increased the usage of internet in India, which took a huge number of discussions online. Online Social Networks (OSNs) are the center of these discussions. During elections, political discussions constitute a significant portion of the trending topics on these networks. Politicians and political parties catch up with these trends, and social media then becomes a part of their publicity agenda. We cannot ignore this trend in any election, be it the U.S, Germany, France, or India. Twitter is a major platform where we observe these trends. In this work, we examine the magnitude of political discussions on twitter by contrasting the platform usage on levels like gender, political party, and geography, in 2014 and 2019 Indian General Elections. In a further attempt to understand the strategies followed by political parties, we compare twitter usage by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Indian National Congress (INC) in 2019 General Elections in terms of how efficiently they make use of the platform. We specifically analyze the handles of politicians who emerged victorious. We then proceed to compare political handles held by frontmen of BJP and INC: Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) and Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) using parameters like "following", "tweeting habits", "sources used to tweet", along with text analysis of tweets. With this work, we also introduce a rich dataset covering a majority of tweets made during the election period in 2014 and 2019.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Sep. 2019

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.