Measuring relative abundances in the solar corona with optimised linear combinations of spectral lines

Authors: Natalia Zambrana Prado, Éric Buchlin

A&A 632, A20 (2019)
arXiv: 1910.02886v2 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
13 pages, 14 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1910.02886v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The study focuses on the measurement of FIP (first ionization potential) bias in the corona, which is important for understanding coronal and heliospheric physics. Elemental abundances in some coronal structures differ significantly from photospheric abundances, with a dependence on the FIP of the element. The authors aim to build a method for optimal determination of FIP biases in the corona from spectroscopic observations that is independent from Differential Emission Measure (DEM) inversions. They optimize linear combinations of spectroscopic lines of low-FIP and high-FIP elements so that the ratio of their corresponding radiances yields the relative FIP bias with good accuracy for any DEM in a small set of typical DEMs. These optimized linear combinations allow retrieval of a test FIP bias map with good accuracy for all DEMs in the map. The results compare well with a FIP bias map obtained from observations using a DEM-dependent method. The authors present theoretical background information on contribution functions and differential emission measure to evaluate quantities involved in radiance equations. They also discuss how two spectroscopic lines emitted by ions of two different elements can be used to determine first ionization potential bias. The study has several practical applications, including obtaining FIP bias maps from existing observations not specifically designed for this purpose, designing observations to obtain optimal FIP bias maps with given instruments, releasing constraints on spectroscopic line lists required to build FIP bias maps, and ultimately helping design solar or stellar UV spectrometers with FIP bias measurement capability. Overall, this method provides a convenient, fast, and accurate way to compute relative FIP bias maps that can be used to optimize existing observations and design new ones. The study's findings have implications for advancing our understanding of coronal and heliospheric physics as well as improving observational techniques in astronomy.
AI-generated keywords: FIP bias spectroscopic lines contribution functions differential emission measure observational techniques

AI-generated Key Points

  • The study focuses on measuring FIP (first ionization potential) bias in the corona for understanding coronal and heliospheric physics.
  • Elemental abundances in some coronal structures differ significantly from photospheric abundances, with a dependence on the FIP of the element.
  • The authors aim to build a method for optimal determination of FIP biases in the corona from spectroscopic observations that is independent from Differential Emission Measure (DEM) inversions.
  • They optimize linear combinations of spectroscopic lines of low-FIP and high-FIP elements so that the ratio of their corresponding radiances yields the relative FIP bias with good accuracy for any DEM in a small set of typical DEMs.
  • These optimized linear combinations allow retrieval of a test FIP bias map with good accuracy for all DEMs in the map.
  • The results compare well with a FIP bias map obtained from observations using a DEM-dependent method.
  • The study has several practical applications, including obtaining FIP bias maps from existing observations not specifically designed for this purpose, designing observations to obtain optimal FIP bias maps with given instruments, releasing constraints on spectroscopic line lists required to build FIP bias maps, and ultimately helping design solar or stellar UV spectrometers with FIP bias measurement capability.
  • This method provides a convenient, fast, and accurate way to compute relative FIP bias maps that can be used to optimize existing observations and design new ones.
  • The study's findings have implications for advancing our understanding of coronal and heliospheric physics as well as improving observational techniques in astronomy.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Context. Elemental abundances in some coronal structures differ significantly from photospheric abundances, with a dependence on the first ionization potential (FIP) of the element. Measuring these FIP-dependent abundance biases is important for coronal and heliospheric physics. Aims. We aim to build a method for optimal determination of FIP biases in the corona from spectroscopic observations in a way that is in practice independent from Differential Emission Measure (DEM) inversions. Methods. We optimised linear combinations of spectroscopic lines of low-FIP and high-FIP elements so that the ratio of the corresponding radiances yields the relative FIP bias with good accuracy for any DEM in a small set of typical DEMs. Results. These optimised linear combinations of lines allow retrieval of a test FIP bias map with good accuracy for all DEMs in the map. The results also compare well with a FIP bias map obtained from observations using a DEM-dependent method. Conclusions. The method provides a convenient, fast, and accurate way of computing relative FIP bias maps. It can be used to optimise the use of existing observations and the design of new observations and instruments.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Oct. 2019

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.