The cross correlation of the ABS and ACT maps

Authors: Zack Li, Sigurd Naess, Simone Aiola, David Alonso, John W. Appel, J. Richard Bond, Erminia Calabrese, Steve K. Choi, Kevin T. Crowley, Thomas Essinger-Hileman, Shannon M. Duff, Joanna Dunkley, J. W. Fowler, Patricio Gallardo, Shuay-Pwu Patty Ho, Johannes Hubmayr, Akito Kusaka, Thibaut Louis, Mathew S. Madhavacheril, Jeffrey McMahon, Federico Nati, Michael D. Niemack, Lyman Page, Lucas Parker, Bruce Partridge, Maria Salatino, Jonathan L. Sievers, Cristóbal Sifón, Sara M. Simon, Suzanne T. Staggs, Emilie Storer, Edward J. Wollack

arXiv: 2002.05717v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
7 pages, 5 figures. For an interactive demonstration of the methods, see https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1CnMGLn-J3pySv8A9ffNWDSlXlJWMrp2W

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2002.05717v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The authors present a comprehensive analysis of the cross-correlation between maps from the Atacama B-mode Search (ABS) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) experiments in both temperature and polarization. These independent measurements exhibit significant correlations with each other and with data from the Planck satellite, particularly in the EE and TE spectra at $\ell<400$ over an area of approximately $1100$ deg$^2$. The TB, EB, and BB cross-spectra show consistency with noise, indicating minimal potential for systematic errors in these specific measurements. This study emphasizes the importance of utilizing cross-correlations between different experiments to validate results and identify potential sources of error. Such an approach will be crucial for future experiments conducted in Chile that aim to explore the $\ell$ range between $30$ and $8,000$. By leveraging these cross-correlations, researchers can enhance the reliability and accuracy of their observations when studying cosmic microwave background radiation.
AI-generated keywords: cross-correlation Atacama B-mode Search Atacama Cosmology Telescope Planck satellite systematic errors

AI-generated Key Points

  • Comprehensive analysis of cross-correlation between ABS and ACT maps
  • Significant correlations among measurements and with Planck satellite data in EE and TE spectra at $\ell<400$ over 1100 deg$^2$
  • Consistency of TB, EB, and BB cross-spectra with noise suggests minimal systematic errors
  • Importance of using cross-correlations to validate results and identify potential errors
  • Crucial for future Chilean experiments exploring $\ell$ range between 30 and 8,000 to enhance reliability and accuracy
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: One of the most important checks for systematic errors in CMB studies is the cross correlation of maps made by independent experiments. In this paper we report on the cross correlation between maps from the Atacama B-mode Search (ABS) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) experiments in both temperature and polarization. These completely different measurements have a clear correlation with each other and with the Planck satellite in both the EE and TE spectra at $\ell<400$ over the roughly $1100$ deg$^2$ common to all three. The TB, EB, and BB cross spectra are consistent with noise. Exploiting such cross-correlations will be important for future experiments operating in Chile that aim to probe the $30<\ell<8,000$ range.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Feb. 2020

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.