AI summary · arXiv: 2004.02575v1 · cs.MA

A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper

Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, Julian Padget

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 06 Apr. 2020 16 pages, 2 figures, pre-print for International Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems (COINE), co-located with AAMAS 2020 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Norm emergence in multiagent systems (MAS)
  • Implicit norms in traditional MAS
  • Normative MAS involves explicit norms
  • Emergence of norms in normative MAS
  • Agents' involvement in norm synthesis
  • Ostrom's eight principles and collective decision-making processes
  • Framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS
  • Agent participation and influence over governing norms
  • Incorporating agent input into the process

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Norm Emergence Normative MAS Norm Synthesis Ostrom's Principles Agent Participation

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The paper titled "A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper" by Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, and Julian Padget explores the concept of norm emergence in the context of multiagent systems (MAS). In traditional MAS, norms are implicit and agents use simplistic decision-making mechanisms. These implicit norms are unconsciously shared and adopted through agent interaction. A norm is considered to have emerged when a predetermined percentage or threshold of agents follow it. In contrast, normative MAS involves explicit norms that are deliberately shared through communication or informed by an authority. Agents in normative MAS decide whether to adopt a norm based on recognition or when a relevant situation arises. The authors argue that a norm can be considered to have emerged in a normative MAS when a certain percentage of agents adopt it. The paper further proposes that agents themselves should be involved in the process of norm synthesis, allowing them to influence the norms governing the MAS. This approach aligns with Ostrom's eight principles, which emphasize the importance of involving individuals in collective decision-making processes. To facilitate this involvement, the authors present a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS. According to this framework, participating agents can propose or request changes to the existing normative system. Special-purpose synthesizer agents then formulate new norms or revisions in response to these requests. Once approved, the normative system is modified to incorporate the new norm. Overall, this paper highlights the significance of involving agents in norm synthesis within a normative MAS and presents a framework that allows for agent participation and influence over governing norms. By considering both implicit and explicit norms and incorporating agent input into the process, this framework contributes to understanding how norms emerge and evolve within multiagent systems.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.