Balancing Training for Multilingual Neural Machine Translation

Authors: Xinyi Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov, Graham Neubig

Accepted at ACL 2020

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2004.06748v4

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their paper titled "Balancing Training for Multilingual Neural Machine Translation," authors Xinyi Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Graham Neubig address the challenge of imbalanced training sets in multilingual machine translation (MT) models. They highlight the issue where some languages have significantly more training data than others, leading to performance discrepancies. The standard approach of up-sampling less-resourced languages to improve representation can impact overall model performance. To tackle this problem, the authors propose a novel method that involves automatically learning how to weight training data using a data scorer optimized to enhance performance across all test languages. By optimizing the data weighting process, their method aims to maximize translation accuracy in both one-to-many and many-to-one MT settings. Through experiments conducted on two sets of languages, the authors demonstrate that their proposed approach consistently outperforms heuristic baselines in terms of average performance. One key advantage of their method is its ability to offer flexible control over which languages are prioritized for optimization. This flexibility allows researchers and practitioners to tailor the model's performance based on specific language requirements or priorities. Overall, the study sheds light on an innovative strategy for addressing imbalanced training data in multilingual MT models, ultimately contributing to advancements in cross-lingual communication and translation technologies.
AI-generated keywords: Multilingual Neural Machine Translation Imbalanced Training Sets Performance Discrepancies Data Weighting Process Flexible Control

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors Xinyi Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Graham Neubig address imbalanced training sets in multilingual machine translation (MT) models.
  • Imbalance in training data leads to performance discrepancies due to some languages having more data than others.
  • Standard up-sampling methods can impact overall model performance.
  • The authors propose a novel method involving automatically learning how to weight training data using a data scorer optimized for all test languages.
  • The proposed method aims to maximize translation accuracy in one-to-many and many-to-one MT settings.
  • Experiments show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms heuristic baselines in terms of average performance.
  • The method offers flexible control over prioritizing languages for optimization based on specific requirements or priorities.
  • This study presents an innovative strategy for addressing imbalanced training data in multilingual MT models, contributing to advancements in cross-lingual communication and translation technologies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: When training multilingual machine translation (MT) models that can translate to/from multiple languages, we are faced with imbalanced training sets: some languages have much more training data than others. Standard practice is to up-sample less resourced languages to increase representation, and the degree of up-sampling has a large effect on the overall performance. In this paper, we propose a method that instead automatically learns how to weight training data through a data scorer that is optimized to maximize performance on all test languages. Experiments on two sets of languages under both one-to-many and many-to-one MT settings show our method not only consistently outperforms heuristic baselines in terms of average performance, but also offers flexible control over the performance of which languages are optimized.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Apr. 2020

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.