WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictions
Authors: Sharan Narang, Colin Raffel, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Noah Fiedel, Karishma Malkan
AI-generated Key Points
- Neural networks have made significant advancements in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, achieving human-level performance.
- Understanding why these networks make specific predictions remains a challenge.
- The paper titled "WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictions" proposes a novel approach to address this issue.
- The authors leverage the text-to-text framework introduced by Raffel et al. in 2019 to train language models that generate predictions and provide natural text explanations alongside them.
- This method does not require modifications to the loss function or training and decoding procedures.
- The model is trained to output an explanation after generating the prediction.
- This approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on explainability benchmarks.
- It enables learning from a limited set of labeled explanations and facilitates the transfer of rationalization abilities across different datasets.
- The authors have made their code available for training these models to promote reproducibility and further research in this area.
- Overall, this paper presents an innovative solution to enhance the interpretability of neural network predictions in NLP tasks.
Abstract: Neural networks have recently achieved human-level performance on various challenging natural language processing (NLP) tasks, but it is notoriously difficult to understand why a neural network produced a particular prediction. In this paper, we leverage the text-to-text framework proposed by Raffel et al.(2019) to train language models to output a natural text explanation alongside their prediction. Crucially, this requires no modifications to the loss function or training and decoding procedures -- we simply train the model to output the explanation after generating the (natural text) prediction. We show that this approach not only obtains state-of-the-art results on explainability benchmarks, but also permits learning from a limited set of labeled explanations and transferring rationalization abilities across datasets. To facilitate reproducibility and future work, we release our code use to train the models.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.