Approaching Bio Cellular Classification for Malaria Infected Cells Using Machine Learning and then Deep Learning to compare & analyze K-Nearest Neighbours and Deep CNNs

Authors: Rishabh Malhotra, Dhron Joshi, Ku Young Shin

7 Pages

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2005.11417v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet
Summaries already available in other languages: fr

Abstract: Malaria is a deadly disease which claims the lives of hundreds of thousands of people every year. Computational methods have been proven to be useful in the medical industry by providing effective means of classification of diagnostic imaging and disease identification. This paper examines different machine learning methods in the context of classifying the presence of malaria in cell images. Numerous machine learning methods can be applied to the same problem; the question of whether one machine learning method is better suited to a problem relies heavily on the problem itself and the implementation of a model. In particular, convolutional neural networks and k nearest neighbours are both analyzed and contrasted in regards to their application to classifying the presence of malaria and each models empirical performance. Here, we implement two models of classification; a convolutional neural network, and the k nearest neighbours algorithm. These two algorithms are compared based on validation accuracy. For our implementation, CNN (95%) performed 25% better than kNN (75%).

Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2020

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.