AI summary · arXiv: 2007.00750v1 · cs.CY

Legends: Folklore on Reddit

Caitrin Armstrong, Derek Ruths

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jul. 2020 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Reddit legends are venerated old posts that have gained fame within the Reddit community
  • The authors aim to explore the utility of Reddit legends in computational science/HCI and folkloristics
  • They investigate whether these posts can be considered folklore, examining factors such as consistent form, cultural significance, and spontaneous transmission
  • They explore whether Reddit legends can be studied systematically
  • The authors create a typology to categorize different types of Reddit legends and analyze references to these legends within the platform
  • They examine textual characteristics related to referencing behavior
  • Reddit legends meet the criteria for being considered folklore and can be effectively studied using text-based approaches
  • The findings have implications for future analyses of folklore on Reddit, enabling tracking of subreddit-wide and individual-user behavior related to folklore
  • There is potential for exploring the relationship between this behavior and other cultural markers present within the platform
  • This paper establishes a foundation for further research in computational science/HCI and folkloristics by demonstrating the systematic studyability of Reddit legends as digital folklore.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Reddit Legends Folklore Computational Science/HCI Text-Based Approaches Cultural Markers

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In the paper titled "Legends: Folklore on Reddit," authors Caitrin Armstrong and Derek Ruths introduce the concept of Reddit legends, which are venerated old posts that have gained fame within the Reddit community. The authors aim to explore the utility of Reddit legends in both computational science/HCI and folkloristics by addressing two main questions. Firstly, they investigate whether these posts can be considered folklore, examining factors such as their consistent form, cultural significance, and spontaneous transmission. Secondly, they explore whether Reddit legends can be studied in a systematic manner. To answer these questions, the authors undertake several subtasks. They create a typology to categorize different types of Reddit legends and analyze references to these legends within the platform. Additionally, they examine textual characteristics related to referencing behavior. Through their analysis, they demonstrate that Reddit legends do indeed meet the criteria for being considered folklore and can be effectively studied using text-based approaches. The findings of this research have significant implications for future analyses of folklore on Reddit. The authors discuss how their results enable tracking of subreddit-wide and individual-user behavior related to folklore. Furthermore, they highlight the potential for exploring the relationship between this behavior and other cultural markers present within the platform. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the phenomenon of Reddit legends as a form of digital folklore. It establishes a foundation for further research in computational science/HCI and folkloristics by demonstrating the systematic studyability of these online cultural artifacts.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.