AI summary · arXiv: 2101.09310v1 · quant-ph

Fusion-based quantum computation

Sara Bartolucci, Patrick Birchall, Hector Bombin, Hugo Cable, Chris Dawson, Mercedes Gimeno-Segovia, Eric Johnston, Konrad Kieling,

and 5 more authorsNaomi Nickerson, Mihir Pant, Fernando Pastawski, Terry Rudolph, Chris Sparrow

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jan. 2021 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Introduction of fusion-based quantum computing (FBQC)
  • FBQC uses entangling measurements called fusions on qubits of small entangled resource states
  • Proposal of stabilizer formalism for analyzing fault tolerance and computation in FBQC
  • Advantages of FBQC: architectural simplifications, hardware made up of identical modules, low depth of operations on each physical qubit
  • Presentation of two pedagogical examples of fault-tolerant schemes within the FBQC framework
  • Numerical evaluation of threshold under a hardware-agnostic fusion error model and linear optical quantum computing error model
  • Addressing non-determinism of fusion through quantum error correction protocol and other errors in FBQC
  • Higher threshold compared to existing literature by tailoring fault-tolerance framework to the physical system
  • Ballistic scheme presented that can tolerate a 10.4% probability of photon loss in each fusion
  • Demonstrates robustness and potential practicality of FBQC in real-world implementations

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: FBQC Fusion-based Quantum Computing Fault Tolerance Linear Optical Quantum Computing Ballistic Scheme

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The paper introduces fusion-based quantum computing (FBQC), a model of universal quantum computation in which entangling measurements called fusions are performed on the qubits of small constant-sized entangled resource states. The authors propose a stabilizer formalism for analyzing fault tolerance and computation in these schemes. One of the key advantages of FBQC is that it offers significant architectural simplifications; it enables hardware made up of many identical modules and requires an extremely low depth of operations on each physical qubit, thereby reducing classical processing requirements. The paper presents two pedagogical examples of fault-tolerant schemes constructed within the FBQC framework. The authors numerically evaluate the threshold of these schemes under a hardware-agnostic fusion error model, which includes both erasure and Pauli errors. They also study an error model specific to linear optical quantum computing, considering probabilistic fusion and photon loss. In FBQC, the non-determinism of fusion is directly addressed by the quantum error correction protocol along with other errors. The authors find that tailoring the fault-tolerance framework to the physical system allows for a higher threshold compared to schemes reported in existing literature. The paper concludes by presenting a ballistic scheme that can tolerate a 10.4% probability of suffering photon loss in each fusion; this demonstrates the robustness and potential practicality of FBQC in real-world implementations. Overall, this research contributes to advancing understanding and development of fusion-based quantum computing as a promising approach for achieving fault-tolerant universal quantum computation with simplified architecture and reduced classical processing requirements.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.