AI summary · arXiv: 2103.11948v3 · q-fin.CP

Deep Hedging: Learning Risk-Neutral Implied Volatility Dynamics

Hans Buehler, Phillip Murray, Mikko S. Pakkanen, Ben Wood

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 22 Mar. 2021 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Paper presents a numerically efficient approach for learning risk-neutral measure for simulated spot and option prices
  • Approach handles convex transaction costs and trading constraints, allowing for stochastic implied volatility model
  • Two-step process: train market simulator for option prices, find risk-neutral density (minimal entropy martingale measure)
  • Resulting model can be used for risk-neutral pricing or Deep Hedging with transaction costs or trading constraints
  • Market dynamics devoid of statistical arbitrage when no transaction costs if and only if they follow risk-neutral measure
  • Comprehensive characterization provided in presence of convex transaction costs and trading constraints
  • Findings contribute to understanding of statistical arbitrage under trading frictions

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Risk-neutral Implied Volatility Dynamics Transaction Costs Trading Constraints Statistical Arbitrage

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The paper titled "Deep Hedging: Learning Risk-Neutral Implied Volatility Dynamics" presents a numerically efficient approach for learning a risk-neutral measure for paths of simulated spot and option prices. This approach is designed to handle convex transaction costs and convex trading constraints, allowing for the implementation of a stochastic implied volatility model. The authors propose a two-step process to implement the model. First, they train a market simulator for option prices using the discussed methodology. Then, they find a risk-neutral density, specifically the minimal entropy martingale measure. This resulting model can be utilized for risk-neutral pricing or Deep Hedging in scenarios involving transaction costs or trading constraints. To support their proposed approach, the authors demonstrate that market dynamics are devoid of "statistical arbitrage" when there are no transaction costs if and only if they follow a risk-neutral measure. Additionally, they provide a more comprehensive characterization in the presence of convex transaction costs and trading constraints. These findings can be seen as an analogue of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing for statistical arbitrage under trading frictions and are deemed to be of independent interest. In summary, this paper introduces an efficient method for learning risk-neutral implied volatility dynamics by training a market simulator and finding a risk-neutral density. The results have implications for risk-neutral pricing and Deep Hedging in the presence of transaction costs or trading constraints. The findings also shed light on market dynamics under different scenarios and contribute to the understanding of statistical arbitrage under trading frictions.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.