Net Buying Pressure and the Information in Bitcoin Option Trades

Authors: Carol Alexander, Jun Deng, Jianfen Feng, Huning Wan

arXiv: 2109.02776v1 - DOI (q-fin.GN)
27 pages
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2109.02776v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In their study "Net Buying Pressure and the Information in Bitcoin Option Trades," researchers Carol Alexander, Jun Deng, Jianfen Feng, and Huning Wan examine how supply and demand from informed traders influence market prices of bitcoin options. The study utilizes tick-level data from Deribit options and supports the limits-to-arbitrage hypothesis regarding market maker supply. The findings reveal that at-the-money option prices are primarily driven by volatility traders while out-of-the-money options are influenced by both volatility traders and individuals with proprietary information about future bitcoin price movements. This highlights a shift in demand-side effects within the bitcoin options market compared to previous studies on established options markets in the US and Asia. Specifically, Deribit is rapidly evolving into a more efficient platform for aggregating information from informed traders. The study also delves into the dynamics of directional-learning versus volatility-learning among traders in different types of options contracts over various time periods. The analysis indicates that in 2019 and 2020, both volatility-driven demands and directional-motivated demands impact out-of-the-money and deep-out-of-the-money implied volatility changes. However, only volatility information drives at-the-money option trades during this period. This suggests that informed traders with privileged knowledge about volatility and directionality tend to prefer trading cheaper out-of-the-money options rather than more expensive at-the-money options. Furthermore, the study contrasts findings from well-developed markets where directional-learning typically outweighs volatility-learning. However, in 2021, only directional-learning is evident in at-the-money put options due to the bitcoin price bubble phenomenon. Overall, these insights shed light on how informed traders' behaviors shape market prices of bitcoin options on Deribit and provide valuable implications for understanding market dynamics in cryptocurrency derivatives trading.
AI-generated keywords: Bitcoin options informed traders market dynamics Deribit volatility

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study by Carol Alexander, Jun Deng, Jianfen Feng, and Huning Wan on Bitcoin option trades
  • At-the-money option prices driven by volatility traders; out-of-the-money options influenced by both volatility traders and individuals with proprietary information
  • Deribit evolving into an efficient platform for aggregating information from informed traders
  • Dynamics of directional-learning versus volatility-learning among traders in different options contracts over time periods
  • In 2019 and 2020, both volatility-driven demands and directional-motivated demands impact implied volatility changes
  • Preference of informed traders for trading cheaper out-of-the-money options over at-the-money options due to knowledge about volatility and directionality
  • Contrast with findings from established markets where directional-learning typically outweighs volatility-learning
  • In 2021, only directional-learning evident in at-the-money put options due to bitcoin price bubble phenomenon
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: How do supply and demand from informed traders drive market prices of bitcoin options? Deribit options tick-level data supports the limits-to-arbitrage hypothesis about market maker's supply. The main demand-side effects are that at-the-money option prices are largely driven by volatility traders and out-of-the-money options are simultaneously driven by volatility traders and those with proprietary information about the direction of future bitcoin price movements. The demand-side trading results contrast with prior studies on established options markets in the US and Asia, but we also show that Deribit is rapidly evolving into a more efficient channel for aggregating information from informed traders.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Sep. 2021

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.