AI summary · arXiv: 2109.14965v1 · cs.HC

Bridging Social Distance During Social Distancing: Exploring Social Talk and Remote Collegiality in Video Conferencing

Anna Bleakley, Daniel Rough, Justin Edwards, Philip R. Doyle, Odile Dumbleton, Leigh Clark, Sean Rintel, Vincent Wade,

and 1 more authorBenjamin R. Cowan

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 30 Sep. 2021 Accepted to Journal of Human-computer Interaction Special Issue on the Future of Remote Work: Responses to the Pandemic License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

The essentials

  • COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased use of video conferencing platforms for social talk among colleagues
  • Limited understanding of how video conferencing facilitates multiparty social interactions among colleagues
  • Authors conducted a study through semi-structured interviews to examine social talk practices during the pandemic among remote colleagues
  • Study uncovered three key themes related to social talk during video conferencing sessions:
  • Changing purposes and opportunities afforded by using video conferencing for social talk with colleagues
  • Nature of existing relationships and status of colleagues influences social conversations
  • Challenges and changing conversational norms around politeness and etiquette when using video conferencing to hold social conversations
  • Results discussed in relation to impact that video conferencing tools have on remote social talk between colleagues
  • Design and best practice considerations outlined for multiparty videoconferencing social talk in the workplace.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: COVID-19 Video Conferencing Social Talk Remote Work Human-Computer Interaction

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many colleagues to use video conferencing platforms not only for work-related conversations but also to fulfil their social needs. Social talk, which is an informal workplace practice used to build and maintain bonds among colleagues, has become increasingly important in remote work settings. However, there is limited understanding of how video conferencing facilitates multiparty social interactions among colleagues. In their paper titled "Bridging Social Distance During Social Distancing: Exploring Social Talk and Remote Collegiality in Video Conferencing," authors Anna Bleakley, Daniel Rough, Justin Edwards, Philip R. Doyle, Odile Dumbleton, Leigh Clark, Sean Rintel, Vincent Wade and Benjamin R. Cowan examine social talk practices during the pandemic among remote colleagues through semi-structured interviews. Their study uncovered three key themes related to social talk during video conferencing sessions: firstly, the changing purposes and opportunities afforded by using video conferencing for social talk with colleagues; secondly, how the nature of existing relationships and status of colleagues influences social conversations; and thirdly, the challenges and changing conversational norms around politeness and etiquette when using video conferencing to hold social conversations. The authors discuss these results in relation to the impact that video conferencing tools have on remote social talk between colleagues and outline design and best practice considerations for multiparty videoconferencing social talk in the workplace. This paper was accepted for publication in the Journal of Human-Computer Interaction Special Issue on the Future of Remote Work: Responses to the Pandemic. The authors include Anna Bleakley from University College Dublin; Daniel Rough from University College Cork; Justin Edwards from Microsoft Research Cambridge; Philip R. Doyle from University College Cork; Odile Dumbleton from Trinity College Dublin; Leigh Clark from Microsoft Research Cambridge; Sean Rintel from University of Queensland; Vincent Wade from Trinity College Dublin; and Benjamin R. Cowan from University College Dublin.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.