AI summary · arXiv: 2110.12175v1 · stat.ML

Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Partially Observable Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits

Hongju Park, Mohamad Kazem Shirani Faradonbeh

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 23 Oct. 2021 22 pages, 4 figures, submitted to L-CSS and American Control Conference License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • The paper focuses on reinforcement learning policy for partially observable contextual multi-armed bandits.
  • Contextual multi-armed bandits are models in reinforcement learning for sequential decision-making associated with individual information.
  • Thompson Sampling is a widely-used policy for bandits, but little is known about problems where contexts are not fully observed.
  • The authors propose a modified version of Thompson Sampling that leverages Bayesian methods to estimate unobserved contexts based on output observations while balancing exploration and exploitation.
  • The presented algorithm establishes theoretical performance guarantees, showing that the regret scales logarithmically with time and the number of arms, and linearly with dimension.
  • Numerical analyses were conducted by repeating simulations 50 times for each case, reporting two quantities: ||bµ(t)−µ∗|| and Regret(t).
  • Parameter estimates converge fast to truth and errors decrease at appropriate rates over time.
  • This paper provides an important contribution to reinforcement learning policies for partially observable contextual multi-armed bandits.
  • Future studies could explore leveraging other techniques such as adversarial training or incorporating expert knowledge into the model.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Reinforcement Learning Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits Thompson Sampling Bayesian Methods Regret

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This paper focuses on the design and analysis of a reinforcement learning policy for partially observable contextual multi-armed bandits. Contextual multi-armed bandits are classical models in reinforcement learning for sequential decision-making associated with individual information. A widely-used policy for bandits is Thompson Sampling, where samples from a data-driven probabilistic belief about unknown parameters are used to select control actions. However, little is known about problems where contexts are not fully observed. The authors propose a modified version of Thompson Sampling that leverages Bayesian methods for balancing exploration and exploitation and estimates unobserved contexts based on the sequence of output observations. The presented algorithm establishes theoretical performance guarantees, showing that the regret scales logarithmically with time and the number of arms, and linearly with dimension. To validate their approach, the authors conduct numerical analyses by repeating simulations 50 times for each case, reporting two quantities: ||bµ(t)−µ∗|| and Regret(t). They show that parameter estimates converge fast to truth and errors decrease at appropriate rates over time. Overall, this paper provides an important contribution to reinforcement learning policies for partially observable contextual multi-armed bandits by introducing a modified version of Thompson Sampling which leverages Bayesian methods to balance exploration and exploitation while estimating unobserved contexts based on output observations. Future studies could explore leveraging other techniques such as adversarial training or incorporating expert knowledge into the model.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.