LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image Text Tuning

Authors: Xiaohua Zhai, Xiao Wang, Basil Mustafa, Andreas Steiner, Daniel Keysers, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas Beyer

Xiaohua, Xiao, Basil, Andreas and Lucas contributed equally

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2111.07991v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
, , , , The paper "LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image Text Tuning" introduces a novel method, called contrastive-tuning, for aligning image and text models through contrastive training while leveraging their pre-training capabilities. This approach, referred to as "Locked-image Text tuning" (LiT-tuning), combines locked pre-trained image models with unlocked text models to achieve the best results. By employing LiT-tuning, the model gains the ability to perform zero-shot transfer on various vision tasks such as image classification and retrieval. The proposed technique is versatile and works reliably across different pre-training methods and architectures including ResNet, Vision Transformers, and MLP-Mixer. The authors validate their approach using three distinct image-text datasets and achieve impressive results when applying it to the transformer-based ViT-g/14 model. Notably, they achieve 84.5% zero-shot transfer accuracy on the ImageNet test set and 81.1% on the challenging out-of-distribution ObjectNet test set. Overall, this paper presents an effective method for aligning image and text models through contrastive training while capitalizing on their pre-training capabilities. The LiT-tuned model demonstrates remarkable performance in zero-shot transfer learning across various vision tasks, showcasing its broad applicability and potential impact in the field of computer vision.
AI-generated keywords: Zero-Shot Transfer

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper introduces a novel method called contrastive-tuning for aligning image and text models
  • The approach, called "Locked-image Text tuning" (LiT-tuning), combines locked pre-trained image models with unlocked text models
  • LiT-tuning enables zero-shot transfer on various vision tasks such as image classification and retrieval
  • The technique works reliably across different pre-training methods and architectures including ResNet, Vision Transformers, and MLP-Mixer
  • Impressive results are achieved on three distinct image-text datasets, particularly with the ViT-g/14 model
  • Notably, 84.5% zero-shot transfer accuracy is achieved on the ImageNet test set and 81.1% on the ObjectNet test set
  • The paper presents an effective method for aligning image and text models through contrastive training while leveraging their pre-training capabilities
  • The LiT-tuned model demonstrates remarkable performance in zero-shot transfer learning across various vision tasks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: This paper presents contrastive-tuning, a simple method employing contrastive training to align image and text models while still taking advantage of their pre-training. In our empirical study we find that locked pre-trained image models with unlocked text models work best. We call this instance of contrastive-tuning "Locked-image Text tuning" (LiT-tuning), which just teaches a text model to read out good representations from a pre-trained image model for new tasks. A LiT-tuned model gains the capability of zero-shot transfer to new vision tasks, such as image classification or retrieval. The proposed LiT-tuning is widely applicable; it works reliably with multiple pre-training methods (supervised and unsupervised) and across diverse architectures (ResNet, Vision Transformers and MLP-Mixer) using three different image-text datasets. With the transformer-based pre-trained ViT-g/14 model, the LiT-tuned model achieves 84.5% zero-shot transfer accuracy on the ImageNet test set, and 81.1% on the challenging out-of-distribution ObjectNet test set.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Nov. 2021

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.