ExoMiner: A Highly Accurate and Explainable Deep Learning Classifier that Validates 301 New Exoplanets

Authors: Hamed Valizadegan, Miguel Martinho, Laurent S. Wilkens, Jon M. Jenkins, Jeffrey Smith, Douglas A. Caldwell, Joseph D. Twicken, Pedro C. Gerum, Nikash Walia, Kaylie Hausknecht, Noa Y. Lubin, Stephen T. Bryson, Nikunj C. Oza

arXiv: 2111.10009v2 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
Accepted for Publication in Astrophysical Journals, November 12, 2021
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2111.10009v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning to analyze the vast amount of data generated by the Kepler and TESS missions in search of new exoplanets. To process over 100,000 potential transit signals and create a catalog of planet candidates is a challenging task that requires accurate and reliable classifiers. In this study, the researchers propose ExoMiner - a deep learning classifier that mimics how domain experts examine diagnostic tests to vet a transit signal. ExoMiner is highly accurate, explainable and robust due to its modular design. The proposed classifier allows for the validation of 301 new exoplanets from the MAST Kepler Archive and can be applied across missions such as TESS. An extensive experimental study was conducted to verify that ExoMiner is more reliable and accurate than existing transit signal classifiers in terms of different classification and ranking metrics. For example, for a fixed precision value of 99%, ExoMiner retrieves 93.6% of all exoplanets in the test set (i.e., recall=0.936), while this rate is only 76.3% for the best existing classifier. The researchers plan to expand their study by utilizing more advanced explainability techniques and designing a framework that can provide experts with insight about ExoMiner's labels and scores; they also aim to conduct an analysis on label noise and underrepresented scenarios as well as publish results on utilizing an adapted version of ExoMiner for TESS transit signals classification by extending its features set similarly to Kepler data processing. Overall, ExoMiner represents a significant advancement in the field of exoplanet discovery with great potential to improve our understanding of these distant worlds.
AI-generated keywords: ExoMiner Deep Learning Exoplanet Discovery Classification Metrics Explainability

AI-generated Key Points

  • Machine learning is being used to analyze data from Kepler and TESS missions to search for new exoplanets.
  • Processing over 100,000 potential transit signals to create a catalog of planet candidates is challenging and requires accurate classifiers.
  • ExoMiner is a deep learning classifier proposed by researchers that mimics how domain experts examine diagnostic tests to vet a transit signal.
  • ExoMiner is highly accurate, explainable, and robust due to its modular design.
  • The proposed classifier allows for the validation of 301 new exoplanets from the MAST Kepler Archive and can be applied across missions such as TESS.
  • An extensive experimental study was conducted to verify that ExoMiner is more reliable and accurate than existing transit signal classifiers in terms of different classification and ranking metrics.
  • The researchers plan to expand their study by utilizing more advanced explainability techniques, analyzing label noise and underrepresented scenarios, and publishing results on utilizing an adapted version of ExoMiner for TESS transit signals classification.
  • Overall, ExoMiner represents a significant advancement in the field of exoplanet discovery with great potential to improve our understanding of these distant worlds.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: The kepler and TESS missions have generated over 100,000 potential transit signals that must be processed in order to create a catalog of planet candidates. During the last few years, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning to analyze these data in search of new exoplanets. Different from the existing machine learning works, ExoMiner, the proposed deep learning classifier in this work, mimics how domain experts examine diagnostic tests to vet a transit signal. ExoMiner is a highly accurate, explainable, and robust classifier that 1) allows us to validate 301 new exoplanets from the MAST Kepler Archive and 2) is general enough to be applied across missions such as the on-going TESS mission. We perform an extensive experimental study to verify that ExoMiner is more reliable and accurate than the existing transit signal classifiers in terms of different classification and ranking metrics. For example, for a fixed precision value of 99%, ExoMiner retrieves 93.6% of all exoplanets in the test set (i.e., recall=0.936) while this rate is 76.3% for the best existing classifier. Furthermore, the modular design of ExoMiner favors its explainability. We introduce a simple explainability framework that provides experts with feedback on why ExoMiner classifies a transit signal into a specific class label (e.g., planet candidate or not planet candidate).

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Nov. 2021

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.