Arm locking performance with the new LISA design
Authors: Sourath Ghosh, Josep Sanjuan, Guido Mueller
AI-generated Key Points
- The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is a space-based gravitational wave detector designed for low frequency range of 0.1 mHz to 1 Hz.
- Interferometer signals of LISA are affected by laser frequency noise, requiring reduction by approximately 7 orders of magnitude using Time-Delay Interferometry (TDI).
- Arm locking has been proposed as a solution to decrease laser frequency noise by several orders of magnitude and mitigate risks associated with TDI.
- A recent study by Sourath Ghosh, Josep Sanjuan, and Guido Mueller presented an updated performance model for arm locking in the new LISA mission.
- The model considered factors such as 2.5 Gm arm lengths, clock noise assumptions, spacecraft motion based on data from LISA Pathfinder, and shot noise considerations.
- The study also included updates on Doppler frequency pulling estimates during lock acquisition.
- Arm locking is crucial for enhancing LISA's gravitational wave detection capabilities and improving sensitivity and accuracy in capturing elusive gravitational wave signals from distant cosmic events.
- This research contributes valuable insights to the ongoing development and optimization efforts for future space-based gravitational wave detectors like LISA.
Abstract: The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is a future space-based gravitational wave (GW) detector designed to be sensitive to sources radiating in the low frequency regime (0.1 mHz to 1 Hz). LISA's interferometer signals will be dominated by laser frequency noise which has to be suppressed by about 7 orders of magnitude using an algorithm called Time-Delay Interferometry (TDI). Arm locking has been proposed to reduce the laser frequency noise by a few orders of magnitude to reduce the potential risks associated with TDI. In this paper, we present an updated performance model for arm locking for the new LISA mission using 2.5 Gm arm lengths, the currently assumed clock noise, spacecraft motion, and shot noise. We also update the Doppler frequency pulling estimates during lock acquisition.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.