WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback

Authors: Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe, Tyna Eloundou, Gretchen Krueger, Kevin Button, Matthew Knight, Benjamin Chess, John Schulman

30 pages
License: not stated (all rights reserved)

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2112.09332v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback" presents a novel approach to fine-tune GPT-3 for answering long-form questions using a text-based web-browsing environment. This allows the model to search and navigate the web, making it more effective in providing accurate answers. The authors set up the task in such a way that it can be performed by humans, enabling them to train models on the task using imitation learning and optimize answer quality with human feedback. To make human evaluation of factual accuracy easier, models must collect references while browsing in support of their answers. The authors train and evaluate their models on ELI5, a dataset of questions asked by Reddit users. Their best model is obtained by fine-tuning GPT-3 using behavior cloning and then performing rejection sampling against a reward model trained to predict human preferences. The authors' model's answers are preferred by humans 56% of the time compared to those provided by their human demonstrators and 69% of the time compared to the highest-voted answer from Reddit. This innovative approach combines machine learning techniques with human feedback to achieve high performance levels. It provides insights into how such algorithms can be used for natural language processing (NLP) and question-answering systems. The study was conducted by Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe Tyna Eloundou Gretchen Krueger Kevin Button Matthew Knight Benjamin Chess John Schulman.
AI-generated keywords: Question Answering GPT-3 Human Feedback ELI5 Imitation Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper presents a novel approach to fine-tune GPT-3 for answering long-form questions using a text-based web-browsing environment.
  • The model is able to search and navigate the web, making it more effective in providing accurate answers.
  • Humans can perform the task, enabling them to train models on the task using imitation learning and optimize answer quality with human feedback.
  • Models must collect references while browsing in support of their answers to make human evaluation of factual accuracy easier.
  • The authors' best model is obtained by fine-tuning GPT-3 using behavior cloning and then performing rejection sampling against a reward model trained to predict human preferences.
  • The authors' model's answers are preferred by humans 56% of the time compared to those provided by their human demonstrators and 69% of the time compared to the highest-voted answer from Reddit.
  • This innovative approach combines machine learning techniques with human feedback to achieve high performance levels.
  • It provides insights into how such algorithms can be used for natural language processing (NLP) and question-answering systems.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We fine-tune GPT-3 to answer long-form questions using a text-based web-browsing environment, which allows the model to search and navigate the web. By setting up the task so that it can be performed by humans, we are able to train models on the task using imitation learning, and then optimize answer quality with human feedback. To make human evaluation of factual accuracy easier, models must collect references while browsing in support of their answers. We train and evaluate our models on ELI5, a dataset of questions asked by Reddit users. Our best model is obtained by fine-tuning GPT-3 using behavior cloning, and then performing rejection sampling against a reward model trained to predict human preferences. This model's answers are preferred by humans 56% of the time to those of our human demonstrators, and 69% of the time to the highest-voted answer from Reddit.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Dec. 2021

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.