Document-Level Event Extraction via Human-Like Reading Process

Authors: Shiyao Cui, Xin Cong, Bowen Yu, Tingwen Liu, Yucheng Wang, Jinqiao Shi

To apper in ICASSP2022

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2202.03092v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "Document-Level Event Extraction via Human-Like Reading Process" addresses the challenges of Document-level Event Extraction (DEE), namely scattering-arguments and multi-events. Scattering-arguments refers to the situation where arguments of one event record are spread across different sentences in a document, while multi-events indicate that a document can contain multiple event records simultaneously. To tackle these challenges, the authors propose a method called HRE (Human Reading inspired Extractor for Document Events) that decomposes DEE into two iterative stages: rough reading and elaborate reading. In the rough reading stage, the document is scanned to detect the occurrence of events. This initial pass helps identify potential events within the text. The second stage, elaborate reading, focuses on extracting specific event arguments. Here, a hierarchical approach is employed, working from sentences to characters to locate arguments across sentences. This effectively addresses the scattering-arguments problem by systematically identifying and connecting relevant information. Additionally, rough reading is explored in a multi-round manner to uncover undetected events. By iteratively revisiting the document, potentially missed events can be discovered and included in the extraction process. This approach effectively handles the challenge of multi-events. Experimental results demonstrate that HRE outperforms previous competitive methods in document-level event extraction tasks by leveraging insights from human cognitive processes during reading to improve information extraction accuracy and efficiency. Overall, this paper presents an innovative approach that addresses DEE challenges through a two-stage iterative process inspired by human reading patterns which highlights its superiority over existing methods in extracting events from documents at a comprehensive level.
AI-generated keywords: Document-Level Event Extraction Human-Like Reading Process Scattering-Arguments Multi-Events Hierarchical Approach

AI-generated Key Points

  • Challenges of Document-level Event Extraction (DEE): scattering-arguments and multi-events
  • Proposed method: HRE (Human Reading inspired Extractor for Document Events)
  • Two iterative stages: rough reading and elaborate reading
  • Rough reading stage: scan document to detect occurrence of events
  • Elaborate reading stage: hierarchical approach to extract specific event arguments
  • Addressing scattering-arguments problem by systematically identifying and connecting relevant information
  • Multi-round rough reading to uncover undetected events, addressing multi-events challenge
  • Experimental results show HRE outperforms previous methods in DEE tasks
  • HRE leverages insights from human cognitive processes during reading for improved accuracy and efficiency in information extraction
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Document-level Event Extraction (DEE) is particularly tricky due to the two challenges it poses: scattering-arguments and multi-events. The first challenge means that arguments of one event record could reside in different sentences in the document, while the second one reflects one document may simultaneously contain multiple such event records. Motivated by humans' reading cognitive to extract information of interests, in this paper, we propose a method called HRE (Human Reading inspired Extractor for Document Events), where DEE is decomposed into these two iterative stages, rough reading and elaborate reading. Specifically, the first stage browses the document to detect the occurrence of events, and the second stage serves to extract specific event arguments. For each concrete event role, elaborate reading hierarchically works from sentences to characters to locate arguments across sentences, thus the scattering-arguments problem is tackled. Meanwhile, rough reading is explored in a multi-round manner to discover undetected events, thus the multi-events problem is handled. Experiment results show the superiority of HRE over prior competitive methods.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Feb. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.