AI summary · arXiv: 2205.01875v1 · stat.ML

Machine Learning based Framework for Robust Price-Sensitivity Estimation with Application to Airline Pricing

Ravi Kumar, Shahin Boluki, Karl Isler, Jonas Rauch, Darius Walczak

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 04 May. 2022 20 pages License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • The paper proposes a machine learning-based framework for robust price-sensitivity estimation in the context of dynamic pricing of products with feature-dependent price sensitivity.
  • A demand model is constructed using a Poisson semi-parametric approach, where the price-related part is parametric and the remaining (nuisance) part is non-parametric and modeled using sophisticated ML techniques.
  • To address potential biases in nuisance parameters, a two-stage estimation methodology is proposed that makes use of deep neural networks or other sophisticated ML estimators to construct estimators of observed purchases and prices given feature vectors.
  • In the second stage, a Bayesian dynamic generalized linear model is leveraged to estimate the price-sensitivity parameters using these estimators.
  • The proposed framework is tested on simulated and real sales transaction data from the airline industry, demonstrating its superiority over direct one-stage approaches in terms of accuracy of estimates.
  • It has several advantages over existing methods such as flexibility and interpretability due to its semi-parametric nature as well as ability to handle complex interactions between features and prices while being robust to biases in nuisance parameters.
  • This paper contributes to improving pricing strategies by providing an accurate method for estimating price-sensitivity parameters in dynamic pricing models which could be applied beyond airline pricing to other industries where dynamic pricing with feature-dependent price sensitivity is relevant.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Price Sensitivity Dynamic Pricing Machine Learning Nuisance Parameters Bayesian Model

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The paper proposes a machine learning-based framework for robust price-sensitivity estimation in the context of dynamic pricing of products with feature-dependent price sensitivity. The authors construct a demand model using a Poisson semi-parametric approach, where the price-related part is parametric and the remaining (nuisance) part is non-parametric and modeled using sophisticated ML techniques. To address potential biases in nuisance parameters, they propose a two-stage estimation methodology that makes use of deep neural networks or other sophisticated ML estimators to construct estimators of observed purchases and prices given feature vectors. In the second stage, they leverage a Bayesian dynamic generalized linear model to estimate the price-sensitivity parameters using these estimators. The proposed framework is tested on simulated and real sales transaction data from the airline industry, demonstrating its superiority over direct one-stage approaches in terms of accuracy of estimates. Additionally, it has several advantages over existing methods such as flexibility and interpretability due to its semi-parametric nature as well as ability to handle complex interactions between features and prices while being robust to biases in nuisance parameters. This paper contributes to improving pricing strategies by providing an accurate method for estimating price-sensitivity parameters in dynamic pricing models which could be applied beyond airline pricing to other industries where dynamic pricing with feature-dependent price sensitivity is relevant.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.