AI summary · arXiv: 2205.08054v1 · q-bio.QM

Classification of anatomic structures in head and neck by CT-based radiomics

Yoichi Watanabe, A. Biswas, K. Rangarajan, G. Rath, N. Gopishankar

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 17 May. 2022 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Investigated differences in radiomics features among various anatomical structures in the head and neck area using CT images
  • Explored whether CT radiomics could be used to classify anatomical structures using unsupervised machine-learning techniques
  • Analyzed treatment planning data from 36 patients with head and neck cancers, totaling 1357 contours of more than 22 anatomical structures
  • Calculated 174 radiomics features for each structure using the SIBEX program
  • Tested uniqueness of radiomics features for classifying contours into their respective anatomical groups
  • Developed a two-stage clustering technique to further classify the 22 anatomical structures into sub-groups with similar characteristics
  • Identified distinct differences in heatmap of radiomics features between tumors and healthy structures in head and neck area
  • Achieved over 90% accuracy in identifying specific structures such as eyes, lens, submandibular glands, pituitary glands, and thyroids using radiomics features
  • Identified six subgroups among the 22 anatomical structures based on shared characteristics such as fatty and bony tissues through clustering technique
  • Demonstrated potential of utilizing radiomics features for disease identification and therapy outcome prediction in clinical practice for head and neck tumors

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Radiomics CT Head and Neck Machine Learning Clustering

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the differences in radiomics features among various anatomical structures in the head and neck area using CT images. They also explored whether CT radiomics could be used to classify these anatomical structures using unsupervised machine-learning techniques. The researchers obtained treatment planning data from 36 patients who were treated for head and neck cancers at a single institution. They analyzed a total of 1357 contours of more than 22 anatomical structures drawn on planning CT scans. Using the SIBEX program, they calculated 174 radiomics features for each structure. First, they tested whether these radiomics features were unique enough to classify all contours into their respective anatomical groups. Then, they developed a two-stage clustering technique to further classify the 22 anatomical structures into sub-groups with similar physiological or biological characteristics. The results showed that there was a distinct difference in the heatmap of the 174 radiomics features among tumors and other healthy structures in the head and neck area. The researchers were able to identify specific structures such as the eyes, lens, submandibular glands, pituitary glands, and thyroids with over 90% accuracy using these radiomics features. Furthermore, through the two-stage clustering technique, they identified six subgroups among the 22 anatomical structures based on shared characteristics such as fatty and bony tissues. Overall, this study demonstrated that different anatomical structures in head and neck tumors have distinguishable radiomics features which can be utilized for disease identification and therapy outcome prediction in clinical practice. The findings suggest that CT radiomics can provide valuable insights into the biological characteristics of head and neck lesions; thus contributing to our understanding of how radiomics can be utilized for clinical purposes.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.