Learning Instance-Specific Data Augmentations

Authors: Ning Miao, Emile Mathieu, Yann Dubois, Tom Rainforth, Yee Whye Teh, Adam Foster, Hyunjik Kim

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.00051v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper introduces InstaAug, a method for learning input-specific data augmentations from training data. Existing data augmentation methods assume independence between transformations and inputs, using the same transformation distribution for all instances. InstaAug addresses this issue by introducing an augmentation module that maps an input to a distribution over transformations. This module is trained alongside the base model in a fully end-to-end manner using only the training data. The authors empirically demonstrate that InstaAug learns meaningful augmentations for various transformation classes, leading to improved performance on supervised and self-supervised tasks compared to augmentations that assume input-transformation independence. In terms of related work, existing approaches also assume independent generation of transformations and inputs. They restrict the transformation distribution to specific classes based on domain expertise. For general classes of transformations, this assumption can be justified through the noise outsourcing lemma. However, for restricted transformation classes such as location-related parameterizations of crops by a CNN, this assumption may not hold. Overall, InstaAug provides a novel approach to learning input-specific augmentations that overcome the limitations of assuming independence between transformations and inputs. The method demonstrates improved performance on various tasks and has potential applications in both supervised and self-supervised learning settings.
AI-generated keywords: InstaAug Data Augmentation Input-Specific Transformation Distribution End-to-End

AI-generated Key Points

  • InstaAug is a method for learning input-specific data augmentations from training data.
  • Existing data augmentation methods assume independence between transformations and inputs.
  • InstaAug introduces an augmentation module that maps an input to a distribution over transformations.
  • The module is trained alongside the base model in a fully end-to-end manner using only the training data.
  • Empirical results show that InstaAug learns meaningful augmentations for various transformation classes.
  • InstaAug leads to improved performance on supervised and self-supervised tasks compared to other augmentation methods.
  • Existing approaches also assume independent generation of transformations and inputs, but restrict the transformation distribution based on domain expertise.
  • For general classes of transformations, this assumption can be justified through the noise outsourcing lemma.
  • However, for restricted transformation classes such as location-related parameterizations of crops by a CNN, this assumption may not hold.
  • Overall, InstaAug provides a novel approach to learning input-specific augmentations that overcome the limitations of assuming independence between transformations and inputs.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Existing data augmentation methods typically assume independence between transformations and inputs: they use the same transformation distribution for all input instances. We explain why this can be problematic and propose InstaAug, a method for automatically learning input-specific augmentations from data. This is achieved by introducing an augmentation module that maps an input to a distribution over transformations. This is simultaneously trained alongside the base model in a fully end-to-end manner using only the training data. We empirically demonstrate that InstaAug learns meaningful augmentations for a wide range of transformation classes, which in turn provides better performance on supervised and self-supervised tasks compared with augmentations that assume input--transformation independence.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 May. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.