AI summary · arXiv: 2210.16229v1 · quant-ph

Experimental generation of polarization entanglement from spontaneous parametric down-conversion pumped by spatiotemporally highly incoherent light

Cheng Li, Boris Braverman, Girish Kulkarni, Robert W. Boyd

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 28 Oct. 2022 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) is a fundamental process in quantum optics
  • SPDC has practical applications in controlled generation of entangled states
  • Pump coherence in a specific degree of freedom (DOF) sets an upper limit on generated entanglement in the same DOF without postselection
  • Cross-influence of pump coherence on generated entanglement in a different DOF is poorly understood
  • Researchers experimentally investigate the effect of using a spatiotemporally highly-incoherent (STHI) light-emitting diode (LED) pump on polarization entanglement generated through SPDC
  • STHI sources are more accessible than lasers and offer a wider range of available wavelengths
  • Quantum state tomography measurements using multimode collection fibers are performed to assess the impact of STHI pumps on polarization entanglement
  • Experimental results show reduced entanglement and purity with STHI pumps compared to theoretically predicted values
  • Despite reduced entanglement, SPDC with STHI pumps remains valuable due to the availability of STHI sources at various wavelengths and robustness to scattering in long-distance quantum communication schemes.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion (SPDC)

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The generation of entangled states through spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) is a fundamental process in quantum optics and has practical applications in controlled generation of entangled states. Understanding the influence of pump coherence on the entanglement produced in SPDC is crucial for both theoretical understanding and practical implementation. It is known that the pump coherence in a specific degree of freedom (DOF) sets an upper limit on the generated entanglement in the same DOF when postselection is not applied. However, the cross-influence of pump coherence on the generated entanglement in a different DOF remains poorly understood. In this study, conducted by Cheng Li, Boris Braverman, Girish Kulkarni, and Robert W. Boyd, the researchers experimentally investigate the effect of using a spatiotemporally highly-incoherent (STHI) light-emitting diode (LED) pump on polarization entanglement generated in SPDC. The choice to use an STHI source as a pump is motivated by its ubiquity and wider range of available wavelengths compared to lasers. To assess the impact of STHI pumps on polarization entanglement, quantum state tomography measurements are performed using multimode collection fibers to minimize postselection effects. The experimental results reveal that the output polarization two-qubit state exhibits reduced entanglement and purity when an STHI pump is used. Specifically, a concurrence value of 0.531+/-0.006 and a purity value of 0.647+/-0.005 are obtained, which closely align with the theoretically predicted values of 0.536 for concurrence and 0.643 for purity. Despite observing reduced entanglement and purity with STHI pumps, this study highlights two important reasons why SPDC with STHI pumps remains valuable: First, STHI sources are readily available at various wavelengths, making them more accessible than lasers. Second, the polarization-entangled two-photon states generated using STHI pumps exhibit robustness to scattering, suggesting potential utility in long-distance quantum communication schemes. In summary, this research provides experimental insights into the influence of pump coherence on polarization entanglement generated through SPDC.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Slides to present it
For journalists Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.