One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings

Authors: Hongjin Su, Weijia Shi, Jungo Kasai, Yizhong Wang, Yushi Hu, Mari Ostendorf, Wen-tau Yih, Noah A. Smith, Luke Zettlemoyer, Tao Yu

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.09741v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper "One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings" introduces the innovative method of INSTRUCTOR for generating text embeddings based on task instructions. Unlike previous specialized encoders, INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that can produce customized text embeddings for various downstream tasks and domains without additional training. The researchers annotated instructions for 330 diverse tasks and trained INSTRUCTOR using a multitask mixture with contrastive loss. The evaluation of INSTRUCTOR on 70 embedding tasks covers classification, information retrieval, semantic textual similarity, and text generation evaluations. Despite having fewer parameters than the previous best model, INSTRUCTOR achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average improvement of 3.4% across diverse datasets. The analysis shows that INSTRUCTOR is robust to changes in instructions and that instruction finetuning effectively addresses the challenge of training a single model on varied datasets. Additionally, the paper discusses how INSTRUCTOR performs on classification tasks by using text embeddings as features for classifiers trained on training data while keeping sentence embeddings frozen. It also explores semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks where the model measures similarity between sentence pairs through cosine similarity of their embeddings. Furthermore, automatic summarization evaluation methods are discussed in the context of evaluating performance on downstream tasks. Overall, the study showcases the versatility and effectiveness of INSTRUCTOR in generating high-quality text embeddings tailored to different tasks and domains without requiring extensive retraining or specialization.
AI-generated keywords: Text Embeddings INSTRUCTOR Instruction-Finetuning Multitask Learning Downstream Tasks

AI-generated Key Points

  • INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that generates text embeddings based on task instructions
  • Trained using multitask mixture with contrastive loss on annotated instructions for 330 diverse tasks
  • Achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse datasets with an average improvement of 3.4%
  • Robust to changes in instructions and effective in addressing the challenge of training a single model on varied datasets
  • Utilizes text embeddings as features for classifiers trained on training data while keeping sentence embeddings frozen for classification tasks
  • Measures similarity between sentence pairs through cosine similarity of embeddings for semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks
  • Discusses automatic summarization evaluation methods in the context of evaluating performance on downstream tasks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We introduce INSTRUCTOR, a new method for computing text embeddings given task instructions: every text input is embedded together with instructions explaining the use case (e.g., task and domain descriptions). Unlike encoders from prior work that are more specialized, INSTRUCTOR is a single embedder that can generate text embeddings tailored to different downstream tasks and domains, without any further training. We first annotate instructions for 330 diverse tasks and train INSTRUCTOR on this multitask mixture with a contrastive loss. We evaluate INSTRUCTOR on 70 embedding evaluation tasks (66 of which are unseen during training), ranging from classification and information retrieval to semantic textual similarity and text generation evaluation. INSTRUCTOR, while having an order of magnitude fewer parameters than the previous best model, achieves state-of-the-art performance, with an average improvement of 3.4% compared to the previous best results on the 70 diverse datasets. Our analysis suggests that INSTRUCTOR is robust to changes in instructions, and that instruction finetuning mitigates the challenge of training a single model on diverse datasets.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Dec. 2022

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.