Where intermediate-mass black holes could hide in the Galactic Centre: A full parameter study with the S2 orbit

Authors: The GRAVITY Collaboration, O. Straub, M. Bauböck, R. Abuter, N. Aimar, P. Amaro Seoane, A. Amorim, J. P. Berger, H. Bonnet, G. Bourdarot, W. Brandner, V. Cardoso, Y. Clénet, Y. Dallilar, R. Davies, P. T. de Zeeuw, J. Dexter, A. Drescher, F. Eisenhauer, N. M. Förster Schreiber, A. Foschi, P. Garcia, F. Gao, E. Gendron, R. Genzel, S. Gillessen, M. Habibi, X. Haubois, G. Heißel, T. Henning, S. Hippler, M. Horrobin, L. Jochum, L. Jocou, A. Kaufer, P. Kervella, S. Lacour, V. Lapeyrère, J. -B. Le Bouquin, P. Léna, D. Lutz, T. Ott, T. Paumard, K. Perraut, G. Perrin, O. Pfuhl, S. Rabien, D. C. Ribeiro, M. Sadun Bordoni, S. Scheithauer, J. Shangguan, T. Shimizu, J. Stadler, C. Straubmeier, E. Sturm, L. J. Tacconi, F. Vincent, S. von Fellenberg, F. Widmann, E. Wieprecht, E. Wiezorrek, J. Woillez, S. Yazici

A&A 672, A63 (2023)
arXiv: 2303.04067v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
11 pages, 6 figures, accepted in A $\&$ A
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.04067v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The Galactic Center (GC) of the Milky Way is home to a massive black hole, SgrA*, and a compact nuclear star cluster that contains a sub-parsec concentration of fast-moving young stars called S-stars. The presence and location of these stars cannot be easily explained by current star formation models, leading to the suggestion that an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) could be present in the GC. To investigate this possibility, researchers used GRAVITY astrometric and SINFONI, KECK, and GNIRS spectroscopic data of S2 to study whether a second massive object could exist deep in the GC in the form of an IMBH binary companion to SgrA*. They employed a post-Newtonian framework and considered two types of settings: (i) a hierarchical set-up where the star S2 orbits the SgrA*-IMBH binary and (ii) a non-hierarchical set-up where the IMBH trajectory lies outside the S2 orbit. The team explored the full 20-dimensional parameter space using Bayesian dynamic nested sampling methods for both cases. For the hierarchical case, they found that IMBH masses greater than 2000 Msun on orbits with smaller semi-major axes than S2 were largely excluded. In contrast, for the non-hierarchical case, there were several pockets of valid IMBH solutions within the parameter space. However, further analysis revealed that IMBHs on semi-major axes larger than S2 tended to disrupt the resident star cluster in less than one million years. This made it highly unlikely for an IMBH to exist among the S-stars. The current data did not formally require an IMBH's presence; if one existed in GC, it would have to be either a low mass IMBH inside the S2 orbit that moves on a short and significantly inclined trajectory or an IMBH with a semi major axis greater than 1". The researchers provided parameter maps of valid IMBH solutions in the GC and discussed their general structure. They concluded that while an IMBH could potentially exist in GC, it would have to be on a specific trajectory to avoid disrupting its surrounding star cluster. The study highlights how important it is to understand dynamics when dealing with moving masses in GC as well as provides insights into potential future research directions.
AI-generated keywords: Intermediate-Mass Black Hole (IMBH)

AI-generated Key Points

  • The Galactic Center (GC) of the Milky Way contains a massive black hole, SgrA*, and a compact nuclear star cluster with fast-moving young stars called S-stars
  • Current star formation models cannot easily explain the presence and location of these stars, leading to the suggestion that an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) could be present in the GC
  • Researchers used GRAVITY astrometric and SINFONI, KECK, and GNIRS spectroscopic data of S2 to investigate whether a second massive object could exist deep in the GC in the form of an IMBH binary companion to SgrA*
  • They explored two types of settings: a hierarchical set-up where the star S2 orbits the SgrA*-IMBH binary and a non-hierarchical set-up where the IMBH trajectory lies outside the S2 orbit
  • For the hierarchical case, IMBH masses greater than 2000 Msun on orbits with smaller semi-major axes than S2 were largely excluded. In contrast, for the non-hierarchical case, there were several pockets of valid IMBH solutions within the parameter space.
  • However, further analysis revealed that IMBHs on semi-major axes larger than S2 tended to disrupt the resident star cluster in less than one million years.
  • The current data did not formally require an IMBH's presence; if one existed in GC, it would have to be either a low mass IMBH inside the S2 orbit that moves on a short and significantly inclined trajectory or an IMBH with a semi major axis greater than 1".
  • The researchers provided parameter maps of valid IMBH solutions in GC and discussed their general structure.
  • They concluded that while an IMBH could potentially exist in GC, it would have to be on a specific trajectory to avoid disrupting its surrounding star cluster.
  • The study highlights how important it is to understand dynamics when dealing with moving masses in GC as well as provides insights into potential future research directions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: In the Milky Way the central massive black hole, SgrA*, coexists with a compact nuclear star cluster that contains a sub-parsec concentration of fast-moving young stars called S-stars. Their location and age are not easily explained by current star formation models, and in several scenarios the presence of an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) has been invoked. We use GRAVITY astrometric and SINFONI, KECK, and GNIRS spectroscopic data of S2 to investigate whether a second massive object could be present deep in the Galactic Centre (GC) in the form of an IMBH binary companion to SgrA*. To solve the three-body problem, we used a post-Newtonian framework and consider two types of settings: (i) a hierarchical set-up where the star S2 orbits the SgrA* - IMBH binary and (ii) a non-hierarchical set-up where the IMBH trajectory lies outside the S2 orbit. In both cases we explore the full 20-dimensional parameter space by employing a Bayesian dynamic nested sampling method. For the hierarchical case we find: IMBH masses > 2000 Msun on orbits with smaller semi-major axes than S2 are largely excluded. For the non-hierarchical case the parameter space contains several pockets of valid IMBH solutions. However, a closer analysis of their impact on the resident stars reveals that IMBHs on semi-major axes larger than S2 tend to disrupt the S-star cluster in less than a million years. This makes the existence of an IMBH among the S-stars highly unlikely. The current S2 data do not formally require the presence of an IMBH. If an IMBH hides in the GC, it has to be either a low-mass IMBH inside the S2 orbit that moves on a short and significantly inclined trajectory or an IMBH with a semi-major axis >1". We provide the parameter maps of valid IMBH solutions in the GC and discuss the general structure of our results. (abridged)

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Mar. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.