Spawrious: A Benchmark for Fine Control of Spurious Correlation Biases

Authors: Aengus Lynch, Gbètondji J-S Dovonon, Jean Kaddour, Ricardo Silva

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.05470v3

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
Spawrious is a benchmark dataset that addresses the problem of spurious correlations (SCs) in image classification. SCs occur when a classifier relies on non-predictive features that happen to be correlated with the labels in the training data, leading to misclassifications during test time. The existing benchmark datasets suffer from various limitations, such as over-saturation or only containing one-to-one (O2O) SCs but no many-to-many (M2M) SCs arising between groups of spurious attributes and classes. To address these limitations, Spawrious presents \benchmark-\{O2O, M2M\}-\{Easy, Medium, Hard\}, an image classification benchmark suite containing spurious correlations between classes and backgrounds. The dataset contains approximately 152k high-quality images generated using a text-to-image model and an image captioning model to filter out unsuitable ones. The experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art group robustness methods struggle with Spawrious, particularly on the Hard splits where none of them achieved over 70% accuracy using a ResNet50 pretrained on ImageNet. By examining model misclassifications, researchers detected reliances on spurious backgrounds, demonstrating that Spawrious provides a significant challenge for image classification models. In addition to addressing background features' influence on SCs in image classification models, future work could instantiate desiderata with non-background spurious attributes and evaluate more generalization techniques on Spawrious. These techniques include different robustness penalties, meta learning unsupervised domain adaptation dropout flat minima weight averaging (counterfactual) data augmentation. Overall, Spawrious provides a valuable benchmark dataset for evaluating the robustness of image classification models against spurious correlations arising from both one-to-one and many-to -many relationships between classes and background features.
AI-generated keywords: Spurious Correlation Image Classification Benchmark Dataset Background Features Robustness

AI-generated Key Points

  • Spawrious is a benchmark dataset that addresses the problem of spurious correlations (SCs) in image classification.
  • SCs occur when a classifier relies on non-predictive features that happen to be correlated with the labels in the training data, leading to misclassifications during test time.
  • The existing benchmark datasets suffer from various limitations, such as over-saturation or only containing one-to-one (O2O) SCs but no many-to-many (M2M) SCs arising between groups of spurious attributes and classes.
  • To address these limitations, Spawrious presents \benchmark-\{O2O, M2M\}-\{Easy, Medium, Hard\}, an image classification benchmark suite containing spurious correlations between classes and backgrounds.
  • The dataset contains approximately 152k high-quality images generated using a text-to-image model and an image captioning model to filter out unsuitable ones.
  • The experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art group robustness methods struggle with Spawrious, particularly on the Hard splits where none of them achieved over 70% accuracy using a ResNet50 pretrained on ImageNet.
  • By examining model misclassifications, researchers detected reliances on spurious backgrounds, demonstrating that Spawrious provides a significant challenge for image classification models.
  • In addition to addressing background features' influence on SCs in image classification models, future work could instantiate desiderata with non-background spurious attributes and evaluate more generalization techniques on Spawrious.
  • Overall, Spawrious provides a valuable benchmark dataset for evaluating the robustness of image classification models against spurious correlations arising from both one-to-one and many-to -many relationships between classes and background features.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: The problem of spurious correlations (SCs) arises when a classifier relies on non-predictive features that happen to be correlated with the labels in the training data. For example, a classifier may misclassify dog breeds based on the background of dog images. This happens when the backgrounds are correlated with other breeds in the training data, leading to misclassifications during test time. Previous SC benchmark datasets suffer from varying issues, e.g., over-saturation or only containing one-to-one (O2O) SCs, but no many-to-many (M2M) SCs arising between groups of spurious attributes and classes. In this paper, we present \benchmark-\{O2O, M2M\}-\{Easy, Medium, Hard\}, an image classification benchmark suite containing spurious correlations between classes and backgrounds. To create this dataset, we employ a text-to-image model to generate photo-realistic images and an image captioning model to filter out unsuitable ones. The resulting dataset is of high quality and contains approximately 152k images. Our experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art group robustness methods struggle with \benchmark, most notably on the Hard-splits with none of them getting over $70\%$ accuracy on the hardest split using a ResNet50 pretrained on ImageNet. By examining model misclassifications, we detect reliances on spurious backgrounds, demonstrating that our dataset provides a significant challenge.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Mar. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.