The Empirical Limits of Gyrochronology

Authors: Luke G. Bouma, Elsa K. Palumbo, Lynne A. Hillenbrand

arXiv: 2303.08830v1 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
ApJL accepted. Data behind Fig1 are uploaded. Code documentation is at https://gyro-interp.readthedocs.io/
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.08830v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
Stellar ages are crucial for understanding the evolution of planets, stars, and galaxies. One empirical method to determine stellar age is gyrochronology, which uses a star's spin-down as a clock. This technique leverages direct measurements of surface rotation periods inferred from photometric modulation induced by spots or faculae. However, the reality of gyrochronology is complicated by effects other than ordinary magnetized braking that alter stellar rotation periods. In this work, Bouma et al. present an interpolation-based gyrochronology framework that reproduces the time- and mass-dependent spin-down rates implied by the latest open cluster data while also matching the rate at which the dispersion in initial stellar rotation periods decreases as stars age. The authors validate their technique for stars with temperatures of 3800-6200 K and ages of 0.08-2.6 gigayears (Gyr) and use it to reexamine the empirical limits of gyrochronology. The study finds that uncertainty in determining stellar age varies strongly with both stellar mass and age. For Sun-like stars (5800 K), statistical age uncertainties improve monotonically from $\pm$38% at 0.2 Gyr to $\pm12$% at 2 Gyr due to empirical scatter of cluster rotation sequences combined with the rate of stellar spin-down. For low-mass K-dwarfs (4200 K), posteriors are highly asymmetric due to stalled spin-down, and $\pm$1$\sigma$ age uncertainties vary non-monotonically between 10% and 50% over the first few gigayears. High-mass K-dwarfs (5000 K) older than 1.5 Gyr yield the most precise ages, with limiting uncertainties currently set by possible changes in the spin-down rate (12% systematic), calibration of absolute age scale (8% systematic), and width of slow sequence (4% statistical). The authors note that available models did not match observations of open cluster rotation periods, particularly for K-dwarfs, which have stalled rotational rates from 0.7 to 1.4 Gyr. Overall, this work clarifies the accuracy and precision limitations of gyrochronology for main-sequence stars using an interpolation-based framework that matches observed data more accurately than previous models.
AI-generated keywords: Gyrochronology Stellar Age Open Cluster Rotation Periods Interpolation-Based

AI-generated Key Points

  • Stellar ages are important for understanding the evolution of planets, stars, and galaxies.
  • Gyrochronology is an empirical method to determine stellar age using a star's spin-down as a clock.
  • Bouma et al. present an interpolation-based gyrochronology framework that reproduces time- and mass-dependent spin-down rates implied by the latest open cluster data while also matching the rate at which the dispersion in initial stellar rotation periods decreases as stars age.
  • The study finds that uncertainty in determining stellar age varies strongly with both stellar mass and age.
  • For Sun-like stars (5800 K), statistical age uncertainties improve monotonically from $\pm$38% at 0.2 Gyr to $\pm12$% at 2 Gyr due to empirical scatter of cluster rotation sequences combined with the rate of stellar spin-down.
  • For low-mass K-dwarfs (4200 K), posteriors are highly asymmetric due to stalled spin-down, and $\pm$1$\sigma$ age uncertainties vary non-monotonically between 10% and 50% over the first few gigayears.
  • High-mass K-dwarfs (5000 K) older than 1.5 Gyr yield the most precise ages, with limiting uncertainties currently set by possible changes in the spin-down rate (12% systematic), calibration of absolute age scale (8% systematic), and width of slow sequence (4% statistical).
  • Available models did not match observations of open cluster rotation periods, particularly for K-dwarfs, which have stalled rotational rates from 0.7 to 1.4 Gyr.
  • Overall, this work clarifies the accuracy and precision limitations of gyrochronology for main-sequence stars using an interpolation-based framework that matches observed data more accurately than previous models.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: The promise of gyrochronology is that given a star's rotation period and mass, its age can be inferred. The reality of gyrochronology is complicated by effects other than ordinary magnetized braking that alter stellar rotation periods. In this work, we present an interpolation-based gyrochronology framework that reproduces the time- and mass-dependent spin-down rates implied by the latest open cluster data, while also matching the rate at which the dispersion in initial stellar rotation periods decreases as stars age. We validate our technique for stars with temperatures of 3800-6200 K and ages of 0.08-2.6 gigayears (Gyr), and use it to reexamine the empirical limits of gyrochronology. In line with previous work, we find that the uncertainty floor varies strongly with both stellar mass and age. For Sun-like stars (5800 K), the statistical age uncertainties improve monotonically from $\pm$38% at 0.2 Gyr to $\pm12$% at 2 Gyr, and are caused by the empirical scatter of the cluster rotation sequences combined with the rate of stellar spin-down. For low-mass K-dwarfs (4200 K), the posteriors are highly asymmetric due to stalled spin-down, and $\pm$1$\sigma$ age uncertainties vary non-monotonically between 10% and 50% over the first few gigayears. High-mass K-dwarfs (5000 K) older than 1.5 Gyr yield the most precise ages, with limiting uncertainties currently set by possible changes in the spin-down rate (12% systematic), the calibration of the absolute age scale (8% systematic), and the width of the slow sequence (4% statistical). An open-source implementation, called gyro-interp, is available online at https://github.com/lgbouma/gyro-interp

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Mar. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.