AI summary · arXiv: 2304.00247v2 · cs.HC
Improving of Robotic Virtual Agent's errors that are accepted by reaction and human's preference
The essentials
- Study focuses on enhancing the relationship between humans and anthropomorphic agents through empathy
- Investigates impact of agent reaction and human preference on human empathy and acceptance of agent's mistakes
- Experiment involved intentional mistake made by agent during task with a human
- Four-condition, three-factor mixed design employed to identify significant factors for designing empathetic robotic agents
- Results showed that neither agent reaction nor human preference significantly affected empathy towards the agent
- Robotic agent's mistakes during the task were allowed by these factors
- Empathy for the agent decreased among participants when an error was made
- Insights provided into controlling impressions of robotic virtual agents' behaviors in society
- Understanding how humans perceive actions of anthropomorphic agents is crucial for positive relationships between humans and robots
- Designers can refine robotic agents based on factors like agent reaction and human preference to create more meaningful interactions
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
We compare the title and abstract with papers indexed in our database. For arXiv papers, we search within the same category; for DOI and other sources, we search across sources and subjects. You can rerun the search as our database grows.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.