AI summary · arXiv: 2304.10137v1 · eess.SY

Genetic-Algorithm-Based Proportional Integral Controller (GAPI) for ROV Steering Control

Ahsan Tanveer, Sarvat Mushtaq Ahmad

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 20 Apr. 2023 Engineering Proceedings 32, no. 1: 4, 2023 6 pages, 3 figures, presented at the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electronic and Telecommunication Engineering (INTERACT), published in Engineering Proceedings 32 License: CC BY 4.0

The essentials

  • Innovative approach: Genetic algorithm-based proportional integral controller (GAPI) for optimizing steering control of ROVs
  • Comparison with other tuning methods: GAPI vs root-locus-tuned PI controller and simulated-annealing-based PI controller (SAPI)
  • Performance evaluation: GAPI provides considerably better performance in terms of overshoot, peak time, and settling time
  • Effectiveness of meta-heuristic optimization techniques: Genetic algorithms can optimize relatively straightforward controllers like PI controllers
  • Potential for future research: Similar optimization techniques can be applied to develop advanced controllers for complex systems
  • Authors' contributions: Conceptualization, methodology development, software implementation, validation, analysis, investigation, data curation, draft preparation, visualization, supervision, project administration
  • Funding and approval information: No external funding or Institutional Review Board approval was involved in the research.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: ROV Genetic Algorithm PI Controller Optimization Steering Control

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This article presents an innovative approach to optimize steering control for remotely operated underwater vehicles (ROVs) using a genetic algorithm-based proportional integral controller (GAPI). The gain parameters of the PI controller are tuned using a genetic algorithm (GA), and the performance of GAPI is compared with that of a root-locus-tuned PI controller and a simulated-annealing-based PI controller (SAPI). The experimental response corresponding to the step waveform for the GA is obtained, and various response characteristics such as overshoot, peak time, and settling time are benchmarked. The findings indicate that GAPI provides considerably better performance compared to SAPI and the root-locus-tuned controller. This study highlights the effectiveness of using meta-heuristic optimization techniques like genetic algorithms in optimizing relatively straightforward controllers like PI controllers. It suggests that similar optimization techniques can be applied to develop more advanced controllers for sophisticated systems in future research. The authors' contributions include conceptualization, methodology development, software implementation, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, original draft preparation, visualization, supervision, and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. It is worth noting that this research received no external funding or Institutional Review Board approval since it did not involve human subjects. In conclusion, this article demonstrates how GAPI outperforms other tuning methods like simulated annealing and root-locus tuning in terms of steering control for ROVs. This study opens up possibilities for further research on applying similar optimization techniques to develop advanced controllers for complex systems.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.