AI summary · arXiv: 2306.00709v1 · cs.HC

Understanding the Social Context of Eating with Multimodal Smartphone Sensing: The Role of Country Diversity

Nathan Kammoun, Lakmal Meegahapola, Daniel Gatica-Perez

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jun. 2023 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Social context of eating is crucial in promoting healthy eating behaviors
  • Smartphone sensing data can provide valuable insights into eating behavior through mobile food diaries and health applications
  • Research on the social context of eating with smartphone sensor data is limited, especially regarding country differences
  • A study was conducted using a smartphone sensing dataset from eight countries to investigate the country diversity that emerges from smartphone sensors during eating events for different social contexts (alone or with others)
  • Some smartphone usage features during eating events were similar across countries, while others exhibited unique behaviors in each country
  • Machine learning models were developed to understand how user and country-specific factors impact social context inference in mobile food diaries and health sensing systems
  • The hybrid approach achieved AUC scores up to 0.75 with XGBoost models
  • Findings emphasize the importance of considering country differences when building and deploying machine learning models to minimize biases and improve generalization across different populations.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Social Context Eating Behavior Smartphone Sensing Country Differences Machine Learning

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The social context of eating plays a crucial role in promoting healthy eating behaviors, and smartphone sensing data can provide valuable insights into eating behavior through mobile food diaries and health applications. However, research on the social context of eating with smartphone sensor data is limited, especially regarding country differences. To address this gap, a study was conducted using a smartphone sensing dataset from eight countries (China, Denmark, India, Italy, Mexico, Mongolia, Paraguay, and the UK) to investigate the country diversity that emerges from smartphone sensors during eating events for different social contexts (alone or with others). The study focused on approximately 24K self-reports on eating events provided by 678 college students. The analysis revealed that while some smartphone usage features during eating events were similar across countries, others exhibited unique behaviors in each country. To further understand how user and country-specific factors impact social context inference in mobile food diaries and health sensing systems, machine learning models were developed with population-level (non-personalized) and hybrid (partially personalized) experimental setups. The hybrid approach achieved AUC scores up to 0.75 with XGBoost models. These findings have implications for future research on mobile food diaries and health sensing systems as they emphasize the importance of considering country differences when building and deploying machine learning models to minimize biases and improve generalization across different populations. Overall, this study highlights the importance of understanding the social context of eating through smartphone sensing data to promote healthy eating behaviors effectively. It also emphasizes the need to consider country differences when developing machine learning models for mobile food diaries and health sensing systems to ensure their effectiveness across diverse populations.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.