AI summary · arXiv: 2307.00756v1 · cs.HC

Towards Real Smart Apps: Investigating Human-AI Interactions in Smartphone On-Device AI Apps

Jason Ching Yuen Siu, Jieshan Chen, Yujin Huang, Zhenchang Xing, Chunyang Chen

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 03 Jul. 2023 14 pages, 6 figures License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Deep learning techniques have led to on-device AI features in smartphone apps
  • AI features enable advanced tasks like speech translation, attracting users and increasing market competitiveness
  • Designing good interaction for AI features is crucial for usability and understandability
  • Existing guidelines and tools do not adequately address the challenges of AI features
  • The authors conducted an empirical study to explore user-AI interactions in mobile apps
  • They identified 255 distinct AI features and summarized 759 implementations into three primary interaction pattern types
  • A multi-faceted search-enabled gallery was developed based on their findings
  • A user study demonstrated the usefulness and effectiveness of their findings
  • Effective interactions for on-device AI features enhance user experience and make apps more competitive in the market.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: On-device AI Speech translation Interaction design User study Empirical study

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
The emergence of deep learning techniques has led to the integration of on-device AI features in smartphone apps. These AI features enable advanced tasks such as speech translation, which not only attract users but also increase market competitiveness. However, designing a good interaction for these AI features is crucial to ensure their usability and understandability. AI features pose unique challenges, including sensitiveness to input, dynamic behaviors, and output uncertainty. Unfortunately, existing guidelines and tools do not adequately address these challenges. This was confirmed through informal interviews with professional designers who pointed out that current guidelines either do not cover AI features or are focused on mobile apps in general. To address these issues, the authors conducted the first empirical study to explore user-AI interactions specifically in mobile apps. Their objective was to understand the current status of on-device AI usage by investigating 176 AI apps out of a total of 62,822 apps. Through their analysis, they identified 255 distinct AI features and summarized 759 implementations into three primary interaction pattern types. Building upon their findings, the authors developed a multi-faceted search-enabled gallery that incorporates their insights. The results of a user study conducted on this gallery demonstrated the usefulness and effectiveness of their findings. Overall, this research sheds light on the importance of designing effective interactions for on-device AI features in mobile apps. By addressing the unique challenges associated with these features – such as sensitiveness to input, dynamic behaviors and output uncertainty – developers can enhance user experience and make their apps more competitive in the market.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.